Tallon Griekspoor vs Facundo Mena — Banja Luka CH Quarter-final

Banja Luka CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Tallon Griekspoor
NED7
Tallon Griekspoor
#57ATP
1789ELO
1726Clay ELO
$970kYTD
$8.1MCAREER
30 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 September 2019
clay
Facundo Mena
ARG16
Facundo Mena
#331ATP
1427ELO
1406Clay ELO
33 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLWLWLL
Griekspoor T.
6-7 7-5 6-1
Mena F.
Griekspoor T.
68762
Mena F.
710511

Tallon Griekspoor defeated Facundo Mena 6-7 7-5 6-1 in the Banja Luka CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Tallon Griekspoor came in ranked #57.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Griekspoor T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Mena F.

Mena F.serving84% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Griekspoor T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Griekspoor T.Mena F.
19
Serve
—
26
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Griekspoor T.Mena F.
1st serve in·Slight edge
64%
56%
1st serve points won·Even
75%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Slight edge
67%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
33%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
65%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.6
5.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.2
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Griekspoor T.Mena F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
76
9
Break points saved·Dominant
99
57
Break points won·Dominant
34
7
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
28
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
10

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Griekspoor T.Mena F.
Freshness·Dominant
96
66

Griekspoor T.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Mena F.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 88 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.[7]
Nagal S.[6]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Griekspoor T.[7]
Krstin P.[10]
6-44-67-5
Nagal S.[6]
Horansky F.[5]
7-616-2
Quarter-finals
Horansky F.[5]
Tabilo A.[14]
6-25-76-1
Nagal S.[6]
Coria F.[4]
6-27-5
Krstin P.[10]
Popko D.[13]
6-46-4
Griekspoor T.[7]
Mena F.[16]
6-787-56-1
R16
Mena F.[16]
Moroni G.
6-46-3
Krstin P.[10]
Berlocq C.[8]
6-26-4
Tabilo A.[14]
Kolar Z.
6-05-76-1
Horansky F.[5]
Collarini A.[11]
3-66-36-3
Coria F.[4]
Kalenichenko D.
7-616-0
Nagal S.[6]
Pecotic M.
6-16-1
Popko D.[13]
Miladinovic M.
7-653-66-2
Griekspoor T.[7]
Clezar G.
6-46-3
R32
Collarini A.[11]
Denolly C.
5-0
Horansky F.[5]
Crepatte B.
6-16-2
Kalenichenko D.
Petrovic D.[15]
3-67-57-64
Berlocq C.[8]
Arnaboldi A.
7-617-65
Tabilo A.[14]
Sabanov M.
6-26-0
Kolar Z.
Baldi F.[2]
6-46-2
Pecotic M.
Oconnell C.[12]
6-35-77-63
Nagal S.[6]
Nedelko I.
6-37-63
Popko D.[13]
Olivieri G.
6-26-1
Miladinovic M.
Milojevic N.[3]
6-26-2
Griekspoor T.[7]
Reboul F.
7-54-66-3
Clezar G.
Dutra Silva R.[9]
6-36-1
Mena F.[16]
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-46-3
Moroni G.
Haase R.[1]
6-16-4
Coria F.[4]
Safranek V.
3-66-16-1
Krstin P.[10]
Balzerani R.
6-26-4
R64
Ugo Carabelli C.
Erler A.
6-43-66-3
Nedelko I.
Zukas M.
6-17-5
Crepatte B.
Zekic M.
4-61-1
Sabanov M.
Serdarusic N.
6-14-66-2
Denolly C.
Shimizu Y.
6-42-66-4
Safranek V.
Ficovich J.
6-31-66-3
Kalenichenko D.
Berrettini J.
6-36-1
Arnaboldi A.
Gerch L.
6-37-5
Balzerani R.
Geerts M.
7-656-1
Olivieri G.
Doumbia S.
1-67-56-4
Miladinovic M.
Etcheverry T.
6-25-77-65
Clezar G.
Sels J.
6-26-3
Moroni G.
Malesevic N.
6-36-0
Pecotic M.
Radanovic G.
6-06-3
Reboul F.
Pla Malfeito J.
7-626-3