David Poljak vs Andrey Golubev — Istanbul CH Round of 64

Istanbul CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
David Poljak
CZE
David Poljak
#1178ATP
30 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 September 2019
hard
KAZ
Andrey Golubev
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Poljak D.
6-4 7-5
Golubev A.
Poljak D.
672
Golubev A.
450

David Poljak defeated Andrey Golubev 6-4 7-5 in the Istanbul CH round of 64 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Poljak D.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Golubev A.

Golubev A.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Poljak D.

Serve advantage — Poljak D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Poljak D.Golubev A.
1st serve in·Even
62%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
64%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
47%
41%
Service points won·Even
60%
56%
Return points won·Even
37%
36%
Break points saved·Even
57%
53%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.9
1.9
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (83 vs 15). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Poljak D.Golubev A.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
8
16
Break points saved·Dominant
38
69
Break points won·Clear edge
6
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
48
7
Tiebreaks·Dominant
1
40

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Poljak D.Golubev A.
Freshness·
76
—

Poljak D.: 2 days rest · 2 matches, 43 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Humbert U.[1]
Istomin D.[5]
6-26-2
Semi-finals
Istomin D.[5]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-33-66-3
Humbert U.[1]
Kavcic B.[16]
6-26-1
Quarter-finals
Van De Zandschulp B.
Poljak D.
6-36-2
Humbert U.[1]
Bemelmans R.[10]
6-737-56-2
Istomin D.[5]
Nedovyesov A.[13]
6-36-4
Kavcic B.[16]
Kuhn N.[12]
6-36-0
R16
Van De Zandschulp B.
Miedler L.
1-66-16-3
Nedovyesov A.[13]
Hoyt E.
6-23-0
Humbert U.[1]
Grenier H.
6-26-4
Bemelmans R.[10]
Rosol L.[6]
6-46-3
Poljak D.
Viola M.[17]
6-746-46-4
Kuhn N.[12]
Ramanathan R.[8]
6-37-5
Kavcic B.[16]
Copil M.[3]
6-37-5
Istomin D.[5]
Marcora R.[9]
3-66-37-69
R32
Kavcic B.[16]
Jianu F.
6-786-32-1
Istomin D.[5]
Zverev M.
6-796-22-1
Grenier H.
Arends S.
6-26-3
Kuhn N.[12]
Cornea V.
6-26-4
Miedler L.
Clarke J.[11]
6-37-5
Nedovyesov A.[13]
Cengiz B.
6-16-4
Marcora R.[9]
Setkic A.
6-16-1
Viola M.[17]
Lamasine T.
6-46-1
Bemelmans R.[10]
Jecan M.
6-27-5
Humbert U.[1]
Gengel M.
6-16-2
Hoyt E.
Elgin M.
6-47-5
Poljak D.
Safiullin R.[14]
6-43-66-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Janvier M.[7]
1-66-46-2
Ramanathan R.[8]
Ilhan M.
6-26-2
Copil M.[3]
Roumane R.
6-30-66-2
Rosol L.[6]
Blancaneaux G.
6-23-66-4
R64
Poljak D.
Golubev A.
6-47-5
Zverev M.
Neuchrist M.
5-2
Grenier H.
Rodionov J.
6-35-76-2
Hoyt E.
Mertens Y.
7-54-67-63
Cengiz B.
Carr S.
6-36-2
Gengel M.
Danilov S.
6-26-0
Setkic A.
Karlovskiy E.
6-37-65
Lamasine T.
Rune H.
6-16-3
Ilhan M.
Turker M.
6-46-3
Cornea V.
Saplin K.
6-06-1
Jianu F.
Yilmaz B.
6-26-1
Roumane R.
Lazov A.
7-52-66-1
Jecan M.
Dzhanashia S.
6-26-0
Miedler L.
Muller A.
6-46-4
Van De Zandschulp B.
Dubrivnyy A.
6-36-2
Blancaneaux G.
Yevseyev D.
7-646-2