Noah Rubin vs Christopher Eubanks — Cary CH Round of 16

Cary CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
USA10
Noah Rubin
30 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 September 2019
hard
USA8
Christopher Eubanks
#788ATP
1523ELO
1493Hard ELO
30 yrs · 201 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWLWLLL
Rubin N.
6-4 6-7 7-6
Eubanks C.
Rubin N.
663772
Eubanks C.
477651

Noah Rubin defeated Christopher Eubanks 6-4 6-7 7-6 in the Cary CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Christopher Eubanks came in defending last year's round of 16.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Rubin N.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Eubanks C.

Eubanks C.serving89% hold

wins 69% of points on serve vs Rubin N.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Rubin N.Eubanks C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
61%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
67%
Return points won·Even
37%
33%
Break points saved·Even
60%
64%
Aces / match·Dominant
3.9
10.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (89 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Rubin N.Eubanks C.
Clutch Rating·Even
49
50
Break points saved·Clear edge
80
96
Break points won·Dominant
31
3
Deciding sets·Clear edge
54
67
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
80
74

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Seppi A.[1]
Mmoh M.[11]
6-26-746-3
Semi-finals
Seppi A.[1]
Couacaud E.[5]
4-67-686-4
Mmoh M.[11]
Aragone J.
4-66-26-2
Quarter-finals
Aragone J.
Blanch U.
6-767-652-2
Mmoh M.[11]
Paul T.[2]
2-67-666-1
Couacaud E.[5]
Peliwo F.
6-36-3
Seppi A.[1]
Rubin N.[10]
6-06-4
R16
Paul T.[2]
Nakashima B.
7-606-4
Peliwo F.
Fratangelo B.[3]
W/O
Mmoh M.[11]
Torpegaard M.[6]
6-16-4
Blanch U.
Patael B.
6-16-4
Aragone J.
Nguyen D.
6-36-2
Couacaud E.[5]
Young D.[12]
6-13-66-3
Rubin N.[10]
Eubanks C.[8]
6-46-737-65
Seppi A.[1]
Smith J.[16]
6-36-2
R32
Aragone J.
Polansky P.[9]
7-646-4
Patael B.
Giron M.[4]
2-67-50-0
Nakashima B.
Kwiatkowski T.[13]
7-646-4
Paul T.[2]
Peniston R.
6-47-63
Blanch U.
Langmo C.
6-36-3
Couacaud E.[5]
King K.
6-16-2
Torpegaard M.[6]
Redlicki M.
6-46-796-2
Eubanks C.[8]
Caruana L.
6-17-5
Smith J.[16]
Mejia N.
6-47-5
Young D.[12]
Olivo R.
6-46-3
Seppi A.[1]
Broady L.
7-656-3
Mmoh M.[11]
Sarkissian A.
5-77-646-0
Nguyen D.
Krueger M.[7]
6-33-66-3
Peliwo F.
Galan D.[14]
1-67-656-4
Fratangelo B.[3]
Redlicki M.
6-46-3
Rubin N.[10]
Song E.
6-36-3
R64
Peliwo F.
Smith R.
5-4
Redlicki M.
Kumar O.
6-36-1
Peniston R.
Zhu E.
6-26-3
Olivo R.
Ritschard A.
7-666-3
Nguyen D.
Sigouin B.
6-16-3
Blanch U.
Novikov D.
6-46-2
Nakashima B.
Babelis T.
6-36-2
Sarkissian A.
Petit G.
6-36-2
Aragone J.
Farren C.
6-27-65
Caruana L.
Arconada J.
7-681-66-2
Broady L.
Chrysochos P.
6-36-0
Patael B.
Adams H.
7-56-4
King K.
Kirchheimer S.
6-42-66-2
Redlicki M.
Rybakov A.
6-46-2
Mejia N.
Bangoura S.
4-67-616-4