Sumit Nagal vs Federico Coria — Banja Luka CH Quarter-final

Banja Luka CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Sumit Nagal
IND6
Sumit Nagal
#241ATP
1543ELO
1538Clay ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 September 2019
clay
Federico Coria
ARG4
Federico Coria
#783ATP
1537ELO
1515Clay ELO
34 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
Nagal S.
6-2 7-5
Coria F.
Nagal S.
672
Coria F.
250

Sumit Nagal defeated Federico Coria 6-2 7-5 in the Banja Luka CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Sumit Nagal closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving59% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Coria F.

Coria F.serving56% hold

wins 52% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Nagal S.Coria F.
1st serve in·Even
70%
67%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
60%
58%
Return points won·Even
42%
43%
Break points saved·Even
58%
55%
Aces / match·Slight edge
1.5
2.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Nagal S.Coria F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
33
67
Break points saved·Even
69
71
Break points won·Dominant
35
72
Deciding sets·Dominant
16
78
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
84
76

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Nagal S.Coria F.
Freshness·Clear edge
96
80

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d) · Coria F.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 53 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.[7]
Nagal S.[6]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Griekspoor T.[7]
Krstin P.[10]
6-44-67-5
Nagal S.[6]
Horansky F.[5]
7-616-2
Quarter-finals
Horansky F.[5]
Tabilo A.[14]
6-25-76-1
Nagal S.[6]
Coria F.[4]
6-27-5
Krstin P.[10]
Popko D.[13]
6-46-4
Griekspoor T.[7]
Mena F.[16]
6-787-56-1
R16
Mena F.[16]
Moroni G.
6-46-3
Krstin P.[10]
Berlocq C.[8]
6-26-4
Tabilo A.[14]
Kolar Z.
6-05-76-1
Horansky F.[5]
Collarini A.[11]
3-66-36-3
Coria F.[4]
Kalenichenko D.
7-616-0
Nagal S.[6]
Pecotic M.
6-16-1
Popko D.[13]
Miladinovic M.
7-653-66-2
Griekspoor T.[7]
Clezar G.
6-46-3
R32
Collarini A.[11]
Denolly C.
5-0
Horansky F.[5]
Crepatte B.
6-16-2
Kalenichenko D.
Petrovic D.[15]
3-67-57-64
Berlocq C.[8]
Arnaboldi A.
7-617-65
Tabilo A.[14]
Sabanov M.
6-26-0
Kolar Z.
Baldi F.[2]
6-46-2
Pecotic M.
Oconnell C.[12]
6-35-77-63
Nagal S.[6]
Nedelko I.
6-37-63
Popko D.[13]
Olivieri G.
6-26-1
Miladinovic M.
Milojevic N.[3]
6-26-2
Griekspoor T.[7]
Reboul F.
7-54-66-3
Clezar G.
Dutra Silva R.[9]
6-36-1
Mena F.[16]
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-46-3
Moroni G.
Haase R.[1]
6-16-4
Coria F.[4]
Safranek V.
3-66-16-1
Krstin P.[10]
Balzerani R.
6-26-4
R64
Ugo Carabelli C.
Erler A.
6-43-66-3
Nedelko I.
Zukas M.
6-17-5
Crepatte B.
Zekic M.
4-61-1
Sabanov M.
Serdarusic N.
6-14-66-2
Denolly C.
Shimizu Y.
6-42-66-4
Safranek V.
Ficovich J.
6-31-66-3
Kalenichenko D.
Berrettini J.
6-36-1
Arnaboldi A.
Gerch L.
6-37-5
Balzerani R.
Geerts M.
7-656-1
Olivieri G.
Doumbia S.
1-67-56-4
Miladinovic M.
Etcheverry T.
6-25-77-65
Clezar G.
Sels J.
6-26-3
Moroni G.
Malesevic N.
6-36-0
Pecotic M.
Radanovic G.
6-06-3
Reboul F.
Pla Malfeito J.
7-626-3