Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Alexander Erler — Banja Luka CH Round of 64

Banja Luka CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
ARG
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
#58ATP
1759ELO
1741Clay ELO
$653kYTD
$2.7MCAREER
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWWLWLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 September 2019
clay
AUT
Alexander Erler
28 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLW
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-4 3-6 6-3
Erler A.
Ugo Carabelli C.
6362
Erler A.
4631

Camilo Ugo Carabelli defeated Alexander Erler 6-4 3-6 6-3 in the Banja Luka CH round of 64 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ugo Carabelli C.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Erler A.

Erler A.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Ugo Carabelli C.

Serve advantage — Ugo Carabelli C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Ugo Carabelli C.Erler A.
24
Serve
—
28
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ugo Carabelli C.Erler A.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
47%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
35%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
2.7
5.4
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
3.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 67). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Freshness

Recent load
Ugo Carabelli C.Erler A.
Freshness·
100
—

Ugo Carabelli C.: 15 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Griekspoor T.[7]
Nagal S.[6]
6-26-3
Semi-finals
Griekspoor T.[7]
Krstin P.[10]
6-44-67-5
Nagal S.[6]
Horansky F.[5]
7-616-2
Quarter-finals
Horansky F.[5]
Tabilo A.[14]
6-25-76-1
Nagal S.[6]
Coria F.[4]
6-27-5
Krstin P.[10]
Popko D.[13]
6-46-4
Griekspoor T.[7]
Mena F.[16]
6-787-56-1
R16
Mena F.[16]
Moroni G.
6-46-3
Krstin P.[10]
Berlocq C.[8]
6-26-4
Tabilo A.[14]
Kolar Z.
6-05-76-1
Horansky F.[5]
Collarini A.[11]
3-66-36-3
Coria F.[4]
Kalenichenko D.
7-616-0
Nagal S.[6]
Pecotic M.
6-16-1
Popko D.[13]
Miladinovic M.
7-653-66-2
Griekspoor T.[7]
Clezar G.
6-46-3
R32
Collarini A.[11]
Denolly C.
5-0
Horansky F.[5]
Crepatte B.
6-16-2
Kalenichenko D.
Petrovic D.[15]
3-67-57-64
Berlocq C.[8]
Arnaboldi A.
7-617-65
Tabilo A.[14]
Sabanov M.
6-26-0
Kolar Z.
Baldi F.[2]
6-46-2
Pecotic M.
Oconnell C.[12]
6-35-77-63
Nagal S.[6]
Nedelko I.
6-37-63
Popko D.[13]
Olivieri G.
6-26-1
Miladinovic M.
Milojevic N.[3]
6-26-2
Griekspoor T.[7]
Reboul F.
7-54-66-3
Clezar G.
Dutra Silva R.[9]
6-36-1
Mena F.[16]
Ugo Carabelli C.
6-46-3
Moroni G.
Haase R.[1]
6-16-4
Coria F.[4]
Safranek V.
3-66-16-1
Krstin P.[10]
Balzerani R.
6-26-4
R64
Ugo Carabelli C.
Erler A.
6-43-66-3
Nedelko I.
Zukas M.
6-17-5
Crepatte B.
Zekic M.
4-61-1
Sabanov M.
Serdarusic N.
6-14-66-2
Denolly C.
Shimizu Y.
6-42-66-4
Safranek V.
Ficovich J.
6-31-66-3
Kalenichenko D.
Berrettini J.
6-36-1
Arnaboldi A.
Gerch L.
6-37-5
Balzerani R.
Geerts M.
7-656-1
Olivieri G.
Doumbia S.
1-67-56-4
Miladinovic M.
Etcheverry T.
6-25-77-65
Clezar G.
Sels J.
6-26-3
Moroni G.
Malesevic N.
6-36-0
Pecotic M.
Radanovic G.
6-06-3
Reboul F.
Pla Malfeito J.
7-626-3