Andreas Seppi vs Liam Broady — Cary CH Round of 32

Cary CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA1
Andreas Seppi
42 yrs · 190 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 September 2019
hard
Liam Broady
GBR
Liam Broady
#198ATP
1590ELO
1577Hard ELO
32 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLLLW
Seppi A.
7-6 6-3
Broady L.
Seppi A.
7762
Broady L.
6530

Andreas Seppi defeated Liam Broady 7-6 6-3 in the Cary CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Andreas Seppi closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Seppi A.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Broady L.

Broady L.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Seppi A.

Serve advantage — Broady L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Seppi A.Broady L.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
53%
Service points won·Even
62%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.6
3.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.8
2.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (166 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Seppi A.Broady L.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
53
58
Break points saved·Slight edge
94
86
Break points won·Clear edge
45
29
Deciding sets·Clear edge
63
80
Tiebreaks·Dominant
32
69

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Seppi A.Broady L.
Freshness·
—
71

Broady L.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 66 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Seppi A.[1]
Mmoh M.[11]
6-26-746-3
Semi-finals
Seppi A.[1]
Couacaud E.[5]
4-67-686-4
Mmoh M.[11]
Aragone J.
4-66-26-2
Quarter-finals
Aragone J.
Blanch U.
6-767-652-2
Mmoh M.[11]
Paul T.[2]
2-67-666-1
Couacaud E.[5]
Peliwo F.
6-36-3
Seppi A.[1]
Rubin N.[10]
6-06-4
R16
Paul T.[2]
Nakashima B.
7-606-4
Peliwo F.
Fratangelo B.[3]
W/O
Mmoh M.[11]
Torpegaard M.[6]
6-16-4
Blanch U.
Patael B.
6-16-4
Aragone J.
Nguyen D.
6-36-2
Couacaud E.[5]
Young D.[12]
6-13-66-3
Rubin N.[10]
Eubanks C.[8]
6-46-737-65
Seppi A.[1]
Smith J.[16]
6-36-2
R32
Aragone J.
Polansky P.[9]
7-646-4
Patael B.
Giron M.[4]
2-67-50-0
Nakashima B.
Kwiatkowski T.[13]
7-646-4
Paul T.[2]
Peniston R.
6-47-63
Blanch U.
Langmo C.
6-36-3
Couacaud E.[5]
King K.
6-16-2
Torpegaard M.[6]
Redlicki M.
6-46-796-2
Eubanks C.[8]
Caruana L.
6-17-5
Smith J.[16]
Mejia N.
6-47-5
Young D.[12]
Olivo R.
6-46-3
Seppi A.[1]
Broady L.
7-656-3
Mmoh M.[11]
Sarkissian A.
5-77-646-0
Nguyen D.
Krueger M.[7]
6-33-66-3
Peliwo F.
Galan D.[14]
1-67-656-4
Fratangelo B.[3]
Redlicki M.
6-46-3
Rubin N.[10]
Song E.
6-36-3
R64
Peliwo F.
Smith R.
5-4
Redlicki M.
Kumar O.
6-36-1
Peniston R.
Zhu E.
6-26-3
Olivo R.
Ritschard A.
7-666-3
Nguyen D.
Sigouin B.
6-16-3
Blanch U.
Novikov D.
6-46-2
Nakashima B.
Babelis T.
6-36-2
Sarkissian A.
Petit G.
6-36-2
Aragone J.
Farren C.
6-27-65
Caruana L.
Arconada J.
7-681-66-2
Broady L.
Chrysochos P.
6-36-0
Patael B.
Adams H.
7-56-4
King K.
Kirchheimer S.
6-42-66-2
Redlicki M.
Rybakov A.
6-46-2
Mejia N.
Bangoura S.
4-67-616-4