Harry Bourchier vs Thomas Fancutt — Shanghai CH Round of 64

Shanghai CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
AUS
Harry Bourchier
30 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 September 2019
hard
Thomas Fancutt
AUS
Thomas Fancutt
#851ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWLWLLW
Bourchier H.
3-6 7-6 7-6
Fancutt T.
Bourchier H.
3777102
Fancutt T.
664681

Harry Bourchier defeated Thomas Fancutt 3-6 7-6 7-6 in the Shanghai CH round of 64 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bourchier H.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Fancutt T.

Fancutt T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Bourchier H.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bourchier H.Fancutt T.
1st serve in·Even
60%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
73%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Even
62%
62%
Return points won·Even
35%
34%
Break points saved·Even
58%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.7
8.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
4.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (53 vs 62). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bourchier H.Fancutt T.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
13
18
Break points saved·Slight edge
51
62
Break points won·Even
16
17
Deciding sets·Slight edge
31
42
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
18
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Bourchier H.Fancutt T.
Freshness·
—
61

Fancutt T.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 61 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Wu D.
6-47-64
Semi-finals
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Gunneswaran P.[1]
7-676-4
Wu D.
Sugita Y.[3]
6-47-62
Quarter-finals
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Harris A.[7]
7-612-1
Sugita Y.[3]
Lopez Perez E.[9]
6-47-63
Wu D.
Altamirano C.
6-46-0
Gunneswaran P.[1]
Moriya H.[8]
6-46-4
R16
Moriya H.[8]
Purcell M.[10]
4-67-626-1
Harris A.[7]
Santillan A.[12]
2-65-5
Lopez Perez E.[9]
Diez S.[6]
6-47-5
Altamirano C.
Ito T.[2]
6-37-64
Wu D.
Ortega Olmedo R.[11]
6-15-77-64
Sugita Y.[3]
Uchida K.[15]
7-626-3
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Sekiguchi S.
6-46-3
Gunneswaran P.[1]
Oliveira G.[16]
6-36-4
R32
Santillan A.[12]
Gabashvili T.
6-26-1
Gunneswaran P.[1]
Ward J.
6-47-63
Wu D.
Polmans M.[5]
6-36-3
Ortega Olmedo R.[11]
He Y.
6-26-3
Oliveira G.[16]
Wang T.
6-736-36-4
Ito T.[2]
Mukund S.
6-46-4
Altamirano C.
Vukic A.[14]
6-47-64
Sugita Y.[3]
Bourchier H.
6-36-3
Uchida K.[15]
Takahashi Y.
4-67-686-0
Diez S.[6]
Hua R.
7-56-3
Harris A.[7]
Ochi M.
4-66-27-65
Sekiguchi S.
Myneni S.[13]
4-66-37-64
Uchiyama Y.[4]
Kadhe A.
7-646-3
Moriya H.[8]
Sun F.
6-25-76-2
Purcell M.[10]
Saville L.
4-67-56-3
Lopez Perez E.[9]
Yamasaki J.
6-43-66-2
R64
Bourchier H.
Fancutt T.
3-67-647-68
Wu D.
Sijsling I.
6-30-0
Kadhe A.
Imai S.
7-626-3
Ward J.
Tokuda R.
6-36-4
Takahashi Y.
Wang C.
6-46-4
Mukund S.
Ayeni O.
6-46-1
He Y.
Velotti A.
6-36-2
Yamasaki J.
Nishiwaki K.
6-36-2
Hua R.
Rawat S.
6-46-4
Ochi M.
Niesten M.
6-46-2
Gabashvili T.
Orlov V.
6-27-5
Sekiguchi S.
Grills J.
3-66-16-1
Sun F.
King E.
6-27-65
Saville L.
Castelnuovo L.
7-56-737-5
Wang T.
Wang C.
4-66-46-2
Altamirano C.
Gao X.
6-16-1