Ulises Blanch vs Christian Langmo — Cary CH Round of 32

Cary CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
USA
Ulises Blanch
#1661ATP
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 September 2019
hard
Christian Langmo
USA
Christian Langmo
#467ATP
1267ELO
1254Hard ELO
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLWLWLLW
Blanch U.
6-3 6-3
Langmo C.
Blanch U.
662
Langmo C.
330

Ulises Blanch defeated Christian Langmo 6-3 6-3 in the Cary CH round of 32 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Blanch U.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Langmo C.

Langmo C.serving88% hold

wins 68% of points on serve vs Blanch U.

Serve-dominated — both hold easily, expect tiebreaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Blanch U.Langmo C.
1st serve in·Even
58%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
74%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
50%
49%
Service points won·Even
64%
64%
Return points won·Even
35%
35%
Break points saved·Even
63%
64%
Aces / match·Even
7.0
7.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.6
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 181). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Blanch U.Langmo C.
Clutch Rating·Even
19
23
Break points saved·Slight edge
83
88
Break points won·Even
2
1
Deciding sets·Even
19
22
Tiebreaks·Even
37
39

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Blanch U.Langmo C.
Freshness·
—
65

Langmo C.: 1 day rest · 2 matches, 56 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Seppi A.[1]
Mmoh M.[11]
6-26-746-3
Semi-finals
Seppi A.[1]
Couacaud E.[5]
4-67-686-4
Mmoh M.[11]
Aragone J.
4-66-26-2
Quarter-finals
Aragone J.
Blanch U.
6-767-652-2
Mmoh M.[11]
Paul T.[2]
2-67-666-1
Couacaud E.[5]
Peliwo F.
6-36-3
Seppi A.[1]
Rubin N.[10]
6-06-4
R16
Paul T.[2]
Nakashima B.
7-606-4
Peliwo F.
Fratangelo B.[3]
W/O
Mmoh M.[11]
Torpegaard M.[6]
6-16-4
Blanch U.
Patael B.
6-16-4
Aragone J.
Nguyen D.
6-36-2
Couacaud E.[5]
Young D.[12]
6-13-66-3
Rubin N.[10]
Eubanks C.[8]
6-46-737-65
Seppi A.[1]
Smith J.[16]
6-36-2
R32
Aragone J.
Polansky P.[9]
7-646-4
Patael B.
Giron M.[4]
2-67-50-0
Nakashima B.
Kwiatkowski T.[13]
7-646-4
Paul T.[2]
Peniston R.
6-47-63
Blanch U.
Langmo C.
6-36-3
Couacaud E.[5]
King K.
6-16-2
Torpegaard M.[6]
Redlicki M.
6-46-796-2
Eubanks C.[8]
Caruana L.
6-17-5
Smith J.[16]
Mejia N.
6-47-5
Young D.[12]
Olivo R.
6-46-3
Seppi A.[1]
Broady L.
7-656-3
Mmoh M.[11]
Sarkissian A.
5-77-646-0
Nguyen D.
Krueger M.[7]
6-33-66-3
Peliwo F.
Galan D.[14]
1-67-656-4
Fratangelo B.[3]
Redlicki M.
6-46-3
Rubin N.[10]
Song E.
6-36-3
R64
Peliwo F.
Smith R.
5-4
Redlicki M.
Kumar O.
6-36-1
Peniston R.
Zhu E.
6-26-3
Olivo R.
Ritschard A.
7-666-3
Nguyen D.
Sigouin B.
6-16-3
Blanch U.
Novikov D.
6-46-2
Nakashima B.
Babelis T.
6-36-2
Sarkissian A.
Petit G.
6-36-2
Aragone J.
Farren C.
6-27-65
Caruana L.
Arconada J.
7-681-66-2
Broady L.
Chrysochos P.
6-36-0
Patael B.
Adams H.
7-56-4
King K.
Kirchheimer S.
6-42-66-2
Redlicki M.
Rybakov A.
6-46-2
Mejia N.
Bangoura S.
4-67-616-4