Taro Daniel vs Facundo Arguello — Szczecin CH Round of 16

Szczecin CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Taro Daniel
JPN7
Taro Daniel
#194ATP
1567ELO
1542Clay ELO
33 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 9 September 2019
clay
ARG12
Facundo Arguello
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWWW
Daniel T.
6-2 6-4
Arguello F.
Daniel T.
662
Arguello F.
240

Taro Daniel defeated Facundo Arguello 6-2 6-4 in the Szczecin CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Taro Daniel came in leading the head-to-head 2–0. Taro Daniel extended the head-to-head to 3–0.

Key context

Head to head

2–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-02-15Rio de JaneiroQ2clayTaro Daniel3-6 6-2 6-3
2014-02-03Vina del MarQ3clayTaro Daniel4-6 6-4 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Daniel T.serving70% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Arguello F.

Arguello F.serving70% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Daniel T.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Daniel T.Arguello F.
1st serve in·Even
60%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
54%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.1
2.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 36). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Daniel T.Arguello F.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
42
6
Break points saved·Dominant
93
34
Break points won·Clear edge
37
24
Deciding sets·Slight edge
16
10
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
43

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Daniel T.Arguello F.
Freshness·
69
—

Daniel T.: 1 day rest · 4 matches, 75 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Kovalik J.
Andreozzi G.[5]
6-756-26-4
Semi-finals
Kovalik J.
Cecchinato M.[2]
7-676-1
Andreozzi G.[5]
Ramos A.[1]
6-32-66-1
Quarter-finals
Andreozzi G.[5]
Carballes Baena R.[4]
6-47-5
Cecchinato M.[2]
Daniel T.[7]
6-796-26-1
Kovalik J.
Lestienne C.[14]
6-46-4
Ramos A.[1]
Jahn J.
7-646-2
R16
Cecchinato M.[2]
Vatutin A.[13]
6-36-3
Lestienne C.[14]
Bonadio R.
5-2
Carballes Baena R.[4]
Benchetrit E.[15]
6-46-3
Ramos A.[1]
Bellucci T.[16]
7-56-2
Jahn J.
Mager G.[8]
6-12-66-4
Kovalik J.
Cias P.
6-46-0
Andreozzi G.[5]
Michalski D.
6-36-1
Daniel T.[7]
Arguello F.[12]
6-26-4
R32
Andreozzi G.[5]
Gakhov I.
6-26-1
Michalski D.
Bagnis F.[11]
5-76-47-61
Carballes Baena R.[4]
Satral J.
6-46-3
Mager G.[8]
Zuk K.
7-666-4
Bellucci T.[16]
Slobodchikov R.
6-46-3
Jahn J.
Molleker R.[10]
6-46-3
Arguello F.[12]
Kolasinski F.
6-47-66
Cecchinato M.[2]
Guinard M.
6-46-4
Vatutin A.[13]
Lenz J.
6-36-1
Daniel T.[7]
Nejedly P.
6-26-2
Bonadio R.
Kohlschreiber P.[3]
0-66-46-3
Lestienne C.[14]
Masur D.
6-26-3
Cias P.
Giannessi A.[9]
6-26-0
Kovalik J.
Giustino L.[6]
6-757-666-1
Ramos A.[1]
Haerteis J.
6-26-4
Benchetrit E.[15]
Bega A.
6-26-3
R64
Guinard M.
Varillas J.
6-27-64
Lenz J.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-26-4
Nejedly P.
Dalla Valle E.
6-13-66-3
Jahn J.
Kopriva V.
7-56-4
Slobodchikov R.
Lindell C.
6-46-2
Bonadio R.
Pellegrino A.
6-26-3
Kolasinski F.
Wessels L.
6-37-5
Haerteis J.
Perchicot M.
2-66-46-2
Kovalik J.
Pavlasek A.
6-36-2
Gakhov I.
Drzewiecki K.
6-27-65
Michalski D.
Tiurnev E.
6-46-2
Bega A.
Choinski J.
6-46-1
Satral J.
Gutierrez O.
7-646-3
Zuk K.
Smola M.
7-686-2
Masur D.
Galus P.
6-37-64
Cias P.
Torebko P.
7-53-66-4