Guido Andreozzi vs Albert Ramos — Szczecin CH Semi-final

Szczecin CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
ARG5
Guido Andreozzi
#1536ATP
34 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 9 September 2019
clay
ESP1
Albert Ramos
1558ELO
1526Clay ELO
38 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
Andreozzi G.
6-3 2-6 6-1
Ramos A.
Andreozzi G.
6262
Ramos A.
3611

Guido Andreozzi defeated Albert Ramos 6-3 2-6 6-1 in the Szczecin CH semi-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Guido Andreozzi came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending the title. Guido Andreozzi extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Guido Andreozzi closed it out in three sets, 6–3 2–6 6–1.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-04-08MarrakechR32clayGuido Andreozzi6-3 7-6(5)

Serve vs return

This season
Andreozzi G.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Ramos A.

Ramos A.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Andreozzi G.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Andreozzi G.Ramos A.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
67%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.8
2.1
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.6
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (180 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Andreozzi G.Ramos A.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
31
59
Break points saved·Dominant
66
95
Break points won·Dominant
21
49
Deciding sets·Dominant
34
80
Tiebreaks·Dominant
71
22

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Kovalik J.
Andreozzi G.[5]
6-756-26-4
Semi-finals
Kovalik J.
Cecchinato M.[2]
7-676-1
Andreozzi G.[5]
Ramos A.[1]
6-32-66-1
Quarter-finals
Andreozzi G.[5]
Carballes Baena R.[4]
6-47-5
Cecchinato M.[2]
Daniel T.[7]
6-796-26-1
Kovalik J.
Lestienne C.[14]
6-46-4
Ramos A.[1]
Jahn J.
7-646-2
R16
Cecchinato M.[2]
Vatutin A.[13]
6-36-3
Lestienne C.[14]
Bonadio R.
5-2
Carballes Baena R.[4]
Benchetrit E.[15]
6-46-3
Ramos A.[1]
Bellucci T.[16]
7-56-2
Jahn J.
Mager G.[8]
6-12-66-4
Kovalik J.
Cias P.
6-46-0
Andreozzi G.[5]
Michalski D.
6-36-1
Daniel T.[7]
Arguello F.[12]
6-26-4
R32
Andreozzi G.[5]
Gakhov I.
6-26-1
Michalski D.
Bagnis F.[11]
5-76-47-61
Carballes Baena R.[4]
Satral J.
6-46-3
Mager G.[8]
Zuk K.
7-666-4
Bellucci T.[16]
Slobodchikov R.
6-46-3
Jahn J.
Molleker R.[10]
6-46-3
Arguello F.[12]
Kolasinski F.
6-47-66
Cecchinato M.[2]
Guinard M.
6-46-4
Vatutin A.[13]
Lenz J.
6-36-1
Daniel T.[7]
Nejedly P.
6-26-2
Bonadio R.
Kohlschreiber P.[3]
0-66-46-3
Lestienne C.[14]
Masur D.
6-26-3
Cias P.
Giannessi A.[9]
6-26-0
Kovalik J.
Giustino L.[6]
6-757-666-1
Ramos A.[1]
Haerteis J.
6-26-4
Benchetrit E.[15]
Bega A.
6-26-3
R64
Guinard M.
Varillas J.
6-27-64
Lenz J.
Sanchez Izquierdo N.
6-26-4
Nejedly P.
Dalla Valle E.
6-13-66-3
Jahn J.
Kopriva V.
7-56-4
Slobodchikov R.
Lindell C.
6-46-2
Bonadio R.
Pellegrino A.
6-26-3
Kolasinski F.
Wessels L.
6-37-5
Haerteis J.
Perchicot M.
2-66-46-2
Kovalik J.
Pavlasek A.
6-36-2
Gakhov I.
Drzewiecki K.
6-27-65
Michalski D.
Tiurnev E.
6-46-2
Bega A.
Choinski J.
6-46-1
Satral J.
Gutierrez O.
7-646-3
Zuk K.
Smola M.
7-686-2
Masur D.
Galus P.
6-37-64
Cias P.
Torebko P.
7-53-66-4