Tung Lin Wu vs Luke Saville — Jinan CH Round of 64

Jinan CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Tung Lin Wu
TPE
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1376Hard ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 September 2019
hard
AUS
Luke Saville
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLLW
Wu T.
6-3 6-1
Saville L.
Wu T.
662
Saville L.
310

Tung Lin Wu defeated Luke Saville 6-3 6-1 in the Jinan CH round of 64 on hard. The result followed the form book — Tung Lin Wu came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 32. Tung Lin Wu extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-08-01WashingtonQ2hardTung Lin Wu6-2 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Wu T.serving85% hold

wins 66% of points on serve vs Saville L.

Saville L.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Serve advantage — Wu T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Wu T.Saville L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
70%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
36%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.8
4.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.8
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 146). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wu T.Saville L.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
10
19
Break points saved·Clear edge
84
69
Break points won·Even
6
10
Deciding sets·Clear edge
6
29
Tiebreaks·Dominant
4
30

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Wu T.Saville L.
Freshness·
80
—

Wu T.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Zhang Z.
Soeda G.[7]
7-52-66-4
Semi-finals
Soeda G.[7]
Lopez Perez E.[11]
4-67-636-2
Zhang Z.
Kwon S.[2]
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Kwon S.[2]
Gabashvili T.
3-66-36-4
Soeda G.[7]
Gunneswaran P.[1]
7-623-66-3
Lopez Perez E.[11]
Li Z.[13]
6-36-756-3
Zhang Z.
Purcell M.[14]
7-636-1
R16
Kwon S.[2]
Santillan A.[16]
7-666-4
Gabashvili T.
Ito T.[5]
7-56-3
Purcell M.[14]
Ferreira Silva F.
2-66-46-3
Zhang Z.
Tseng C.
6-46-3
Lopez Perez E.[11]
Ward J.
7-646-3
Li Z.[13]
Duckworth J.[4]
7-636-3
Soeda G.[7]
Wu D.
6-26-1
Gunneswaran P.[1]
Wu T.
6-47-63
R32
Soeda G.[7]
Oliveira G.
6-31-0
Li Z.[13]
Nedelko I.
7-667-67
Tseng C.
Krstin P.[9]
7-627-61
Ferreira Silva F.
Ebden M.[3]
6-46-4
Zhang Z.
Diez S.[8]
6-36-3
Kwon S.[2]
He Y.
6-46-2
Santillan A.[16]
Sekiguchi S.
6-16-2
Ito T.[5]
Crepatte B.
6-46-0
Purcell M.[14]
Song E.
6-31-66-3
Lopez Perez E.[11]
Uchida K.
7-646-3
Duckworth J.[4]
Zhang Z.
6-16-4
Wu T.
Ortega Olmedo R.[15]
5-76-27-5
Gunneswaran P.[1]
Tokuda R.
6-26-2
Gabashvili T.
Bai Y.[12]
4-66-36-2
Ward J.
Uchiyama Y.[6]
4-67-646-0
Wu D.
Moriya H.[10]
6-37-5
R64
He Y.
Gao X.
6-16-4
Sekiguchi S.
Mukund S.
6-36-3
Ward J.
Vukic A.
6-33-66-3
Wu D.
Altamirano C.
6-46-4
Tseng C.
Imai S.
7-54-66-2
Gabashvili T.
Grills J.
6-45-76-1
Crepatte B.
Yang T.
6-47-66
Song E.
Bourchier H.
6-46-3
Zhang Z.
Cui J.
2-66-36-3
Nedelko I.
Nam J.
4-67-56-3
Zhang Z.
Sun F.
6-36-4
Uchida K.
Chung Y.
6-26-4
Oliveira G.
Sijsling I.
6-36-2
Wu T.
Saville L.
6-36-1
Tokuda R.
Wang T.
3-67-56-3