Tommy Paul vs Noah Rubin — New Haven CH Semi-final

New Haven CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
Tommy Paul
USA6
Tommy Paul
#24ATP
1949ELO
1881Hard ELO
$1.7MYTD
$15MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWWWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 2 September 2019
hard
USA
Noah Rubin
30 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWWLLLL
Paul T.
6-0 7-6
Rubin N.
Paul T.
67102
Rubin N.
0680

Tommy Paul defeated Noah Rubin 6-0 7-6 in the New Haven CH semi-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Paul T.serving86% hold

wins 67% of points on serve vs Rubin N.

Rubin N.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Paul T.

Serve advantage — Paul T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Paul T.Rubin N.
71
Serve
—
54
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Paul T.Rubin N.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
72%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
49%
Service points won·Even
65%
61%
Return points won·Even
39%
37%
Break points saved·Even
64%
61%
Aces / match·Clear edge
6.1
4.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.7

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 89). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Paul T.Rubin N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
93
49
Break points saved·Clear edge
99
80
Break points won·Dominant
87
31
Deciding sets·Dominant
98
54
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
96
80

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Paul T.Rubin N.
Freshness·
91
—

Paul T.: 11 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast
Final
Paul T.[6]
Giron M.[9]
6-36-3
Semi-finals
Giron M.[9]
Dzumhur D.[3]
7-55-76-2
Paul T.[6]
Rubin N.
6-07-68
Quarter-finals
Rubin N.
Seppi A.[1]
7-647-64
Dzumhur D.[3]
Mmoh M.
3-66-26-1
Giron M.[9]
Schnur B.[2]
6-36-2
Paul T.[6]
Klahn B.[4]
6-46-4
R16
Paul T.[6]
Bangoura S.
6-17-5
Dzumhur D.[3]
Shane R.
W/O
Schnur B.[2]
King D.[14]
2-66-36-4
Klahn B.[4]
Eubanks C.[15]
3-66-37-64
Rubin N.
Laaksonen H.[7]
6-26-2
Giron M.[9]
Istomin D.[8]
2-67-616-3
Mmoh M.
Gomez E.[11]
6-30-66-4
Seppi A.[1]
Polansky P.[16]
6-776-16-3
R32
Giron M.[9]
Mcnally J.
7-667-65
Laaksonen H.[7]
Smith J.
7-637-61
Eubanks C.[15]
Kirchheimer S.
7-646-4
Schnur B.[2]
Aragone J.
7-56-2
King D.[14]
Arevalo M.
6-43-66-2
Istomin D.[8]
Young D.
6-46-3
Dzumhur D.[3]
Chrysochos P.
6-36-2
Shane R.
Krueger M.[13]
6-36-4
Gomez E.[11]
Galan D.
6-36-0
Mmoh M.
Kudla D.[5]
7-56-0
Paul T.[6]
Kwiatkowski T.
7-636-4
Bangoura S.
Torpegaard M.[12]
7-6104-66-1
Klahn B.[4]
Blanch U.
7-675-77-66
Rubin N.
Couacaud E.[10]
0-66-26-1
Polansky P.[16]
Zhu E.
6-46-3
Seppi A.[1]
Smith R.
7-636-3
R64
Kwiatkowski T.
Sinclair C.
7-656-2
Blanch U.
Ayeni O.
6-36-2
Bangoura S.
Sarkissian A.
6-36-726-3
Rubin N.
Quiroz R.
7-636-4
Aragone J.
Carr S.
6-26-3
Arevalo M.
Redlicki M.
6-46-4
Mcnally J.
Sarmiento R.
3-67-656-4
Young D.
Peliwo F.
6-36-4
Shane R.
Kovacevic A.
6-46-4
Galan D.
Ritschard A.
6-47-63
Mmoh M.
Broady L.
6-17-62
Kirchheimer S.
Escobedo E.
6-46-4
Smith J.
Mejia N.
6-746-36-4
Zhu E.
Redlicki M.
6-37-65
Smith R.
Corwin F.
6-31-66-4