Sumit Nagal vs Peter PolanskyUs Open Qualifying Round 2

Us Open · CHALLENGER · Qualifying Round 2
#241ATP
1543ELO
1476Hard ELO
28 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWWWLLLL
0 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 August 2019
hard
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLWL
Nagal S.
7-5 7-6
Polansky P.
Nagal S.
7772
Polansky P.
560

Sumit Nagal defeated Peter Polansky 7-5 7-6 in the Us Open qualifying round 2 on hard. The result followed the form book — Sumit Nagal came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Sumit Nagal extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

10
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2019-08-26US OpenQ2hardSumit Nagal7-5 7-6(0)

Serve vs return

This season
Nagal S.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Polansky P.

Polansky P.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Nagal S.

Serve advantage — Nagal S.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
1st serve in·Clear edge
70%
55%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
60%
61%
Return points won·Slight edge
42%
35%
Break points saved·Even
58%
61%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.5
5.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.8
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 127). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
33
18
Break points saved·Clear edge
69
82
Break points won·Clear edge
35
12
Deciding sets·Even
16
16
Tiebreaks·Dominant
84
19

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Freshness·
96

Nagal S.: 8 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw — qualifying

Q1
Menendez Maceiras A.
Halys Q.
6-26-2
Giraldo S.
Marcora R.
6-46-3
Zverev M.
Istomin D.
7-647-68
Kwon S.
Aragone J.
6-41-66-4
Otte O.
Nanda G.
7-646-1
Diez S.
Sela D.
4-66-46-2
Watanuki Y.
Gulbis E.
6-26-1
Majchrzak K.
Berlocq C.
6-33-66-3
Robredo T.
Soeda G.
6-46-4
Bemelmans R.
Moriya H.
6-17-65
Ivashka I.
Moraing M.
6-36-0
King D.
Jaziri M.
6-26-4
Caruso S.
Chung Y.
6-06-2
Rosol L.
Rola B.
7-53-66-1
Krueger M.
Clarke J.
6-726-46-4
Gerasimov E.
Kozlov S.
6-46-4
Kamke T.
Andreozzi G.
4-67-656-3
Baldi F.
Ramanathan R.
7-57-69
Kuhn N.
Stakhovsky S.
6-46-4
Lacko L.
Maden Y.
6-46-3
Barrere G.
Harris A.
6-757-627-63
Milojevic N.
Purcell M.
6-36-736-3
Torpegaard M.
Molleker R.
6-27-5
Galan D.
Bolt A.
6-36-3
Ymer M.
Kwiatkowski T.
5-76-37-62
Bagnis F.
Rybakov A.
4-66-16-2
Napolitano S.
Riffice S.
6-26-4
Chung H.
Ofner S.
6-36-3
Paul T.
Hanfmann Y.
4-66-47-63
Martinez P.
Coria F.
4-66-36-2
Brooksby J.
Uchida K.
6-36-2
Sugita Y.
Polmans M.
6-36-4
Koepfer D.
Harrison R.
6-16-1
Mahut N.
Cressy M.
3-67-56-1
Kavcic B.
Cachin P.
6-14-66-1
Uchiyama Y.
Davidovich Fokina A.
7-656-3
Lestienne C.
Bachinger M.
7-623-67-5
Giannessi A.
Wolf J.
2-67-56-2
Rubin N.
Mager G.
6-26-3
Garcia Lopez G.
Giustino L.
3-67-56-2
Gombos N.
Janvier M.
6-36-2
Menezes J.
Horansky F.
4-66-16-2
Polansky P.
Dutra Silva R.
6-33-66-4
Nagal S.
Ito T.
7-666-2
Vilella Martinez M.
Daniel T.
7-656-766-4
Santillan A.
Krstin P.
6-16-4
Galovic V.
Smith J.
7-656-4
Sinner J.
Viola M.
6-16-0
Lorenzi P.
Lopez Perez E.
7-56-2
Couacaud E.
Vatutin A.
7-626-3
Vesely J.
Sousa P.
6-47-5
Jung J.
Young D.
6-36-747-5
Griekspoor T.
Ymer E.
7-56-2
Ilkel C.
Quiroz R.
6-16-4
Ward J.
Li Z.
7-656-3
Trungelliti M.
Duckworth J.
6-35-76-3
Basic M.
Gojowczyk P.
6-43-66-3
Coppejans K.
Korda S.
5-76-36-1
Kolar Z.
Mmoh M.
2-66-17-61
Gomez E.
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-4
Zhang Z.
Gaio F.
7-636-3
Benchetrit E.
Travaglia S.
2-67-636-2
Domingues J.
Nedovyesov A.
6-26-2
Donskoy E.
Zapata Miralles B.
6-26-3