Lorenzo Musetti vs Julian Ocleppo — Como CH Round of 64

Como CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Lorenzo Musetti
ITA
Lorenzo Musetti
#14ATP
1869ELO
1853Clay ELO
$961kYTD
$15MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 August 2019
clay
ITA
Julian Ocleppo
28 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLWWLW
Musetti L.
6-4 6-4
Ocleppo J.
Musetti L.
662
Ocleppo J.
440

Lorenzo Musetti defeated Julian Ocleppo 6-4 6-4 in the Como CH round of 64 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Lorenzo Musetti edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Musetti L.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Ocleppo J.

Ocleppo J.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Musetti L.

Serve advantage — Musetti L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Musetti L.Ocleppo J.
34
Serve
—
—
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Musetti L.Ocleppo J.
1st serve in·Even
64%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.0
4.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.1
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 90). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Musetti L.Ocleppo J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
89
0
Break points saved·Dominant
98
39
Break points won·Dominant
82
6
Deciding sets·Dominant
99
14
Tiebreaks·Dominant
95
16

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Mena F.
Martin A.[6]
2-66-46-1
Semi-finals
Martin A.[6]
Travaglia S.[1]
6-26-1
Mena F.
Giannessi A.[8]
6-21-66-2
Quarter-finals
Mena F.
Sousa P.[3]
6-26-0
Martin A.[6]
Altmaier D.
7-640-3
Giannessi A.[8]
Popko D.
7-664-66-4
Travaglia S.[1]
Sels J.
6-46-4
R16
Popko D.
Choinski J.
2-66-26-1
Giannessi A.[8]
Ofner S.[10]
6-46-2
Sousa P.[3]
Tabilo A.[14]
6-756-46-0
Mena F.
Bagnis F.[9]
3-66-36-1
Martin A.[6]
Oconnell C.[12]
6-26-2
Altmaier D.
Rola B.[4]
3-66-36-4
Sels J.
Doumbia S.
6-17-64
Travaglia S.[1]
Galovic V.[13]
7-625-77-62
R32
Rola B.[4]
Zeppieri G.
7-56-4
Oconnell C.[12]
Quinzi G.
6-06-741-1
Travaglia S.[1]
Musetti L.
3-67-56-4
Choinski J.
Caruso S.[2]
7-626-2
Popko D.
Bellucci T.[15]
6-36-3
Ofner S.[10]
Escobar G.
6-37-64
Giannessi A.[8]
Tatlot J.
1-66-46-3
Sousa P.[3]
Reboul F.
6-26-2
Tabilo A.[14]
Molcan A.
6-47-66
Bagnis F.[9]
Pellegrino A.
6-32-66-2
Mena F.
Giustino L.[5]
6-36-2
Martin A.[6]
Bonadio R.
6-46-4
Altmaier D.
Karatsev A.[16]
1-67-656-3
Doumbia S.
Baldi F.[7]
3-67-626-2
Sels J.
Robredo T.[11]
5-77-56-3
Galovic V.[13]
Brancaccio R.
6-17-5
R64
Altmaier D.
Cerundolo F.
6-36-4
Molcan A.
Ehrat S.
7-676-4
Quinzi G.
Eriksson M.
7-56-4
Brancaccio R.
Iannaccone F.
7-56-0
Escobar G.
Moroni G.
6-06-1
Choinski J.
Barrios Vera T.
6-26-3
Tatlot J.
Huesler M.
2-67-56-3
Reboul F.
Gimeno Traver D.
6-13-66-3
Mena F.
Torebko P.
6-746-36-1
Bonadio R.
Muller A.
6-22-66-3
Zeppieri G.
Sultanov K.
6-26-0
Doumbia S.
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-4
Sels J.
Lenz J.
6-34-66-3
Musetti L.
Ocleppo J.
6-46-4
Popko D.
Guinard M.
6-46-3
Pellegrino A.
Forti F.
6-26-3