Matteo Viola vs Daniel Masur — Mallorca CH Semi-final

Mallorca CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
ITA
Matteo Viola
39 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 August 2019
hard
Daniel Masur
GER
Daniel Masur
#386ATP
1413ELO
1383Hard ELO
31 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLLLWW
Viola M.
7-6 4-6 6-2
Masur D.
Viola M.
77462
Masur D.
63621

Matteo Viola defeated Daniel Masur 7-6 4-6 6-2 in the Mallorca CH semi-final on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Matteo Viola closed it out in three sets, 7–6 4–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Viola M.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Masur D.

Masur D.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Viola M.

Serve advantage — Masur D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Viola M.Masur D.
1st serve in·Even
67%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
57%
63%
Return points won·Even
40%
37%
Break points saved·Slight edge
54%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.3
5.4
Double faults / match·Even
3.5
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (151 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Viola M.Masur D.
Clutch Rating·Even
8
10
Break points saved·Dominant
20
73
Break points won·Clear edge
25
5
Deciding sets·Even
15
15
Tiebreaks·Dominant
71
13

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Viola M.Masur D.
Freshness·
—
99

Masur D.: 14 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Ruusuvuori E.[15]
Viola M.
6-06-1
Semi-finals
Viola M.
Masur D.
7-634-66-2
Ruusuvuori E.[15]
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
7-56-2
Quarter-finals
Masur D.
Marchenko I.
7-626-2
Viola M.
Kavcic B.
6-26-1
Ruusuvuori E.[15]
Martinez P.[9]
6-36-1
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
Rodionov J.
6-41-67-63
R16
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
Menendez Maceiras A.[12]
6-13-0
Viola M.
Murray A.
3-66-47-63
Masur D.
Miedler L.
2-66-47-610
Marchenko I.
Safiullin R.
6-16-2
Kavcic B.
Stakhovsky S.[7]
6-46-2
Martinez P.[9]
Van Rijthoven T.
6-37-65
Ruusuvuori E.[15]
Maden Y.[4]
6-46-3
Rodionov J.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-756-36-4
R32
Van De Zandschulp B.
Vilella Martinez M.[14]
6-24-1
Stakhovsky S.[7]
Petrovic D.
3-67-636-6
Murray A.
Gombos N.[3]
6-36-4
Viola M.
Lopez Perez E.[16]
7-666-716-0
Masur D.
Bachinger M.[2]
2-66-06-4
Marchenko I.
Sela D.[11]
6-46-2
Van Rijthoven T.
Gaio F.[6]
7-663-66-4
Martinez P.[9]
Bega A.
6-46-3
Ruusuvuori E.[15]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-37-65
Maden Y.[4]
Celikbilek A.
5-77-57-5
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
Heller P.
7-56-4
Menendez Maceiras A.[12]
Ignatik U.
6-36-2
Rodionov J.
Gojowczyk P.[1]
7-666-4
Miedler L.
Berlocq C.[13]
6-46-776-4
Safiullin R.
Rosol L.[8]
7-656-1
Kavcic B.
Halys Q.[10]
6-36-2
R64
Van Rijthoven T.
Sakharov G.
6-20-0
Rodionov J.
Alcaraz C.
6-46-4
Kavcic B.
Granollers G.
6-17-61
Viola M.
Gil F.
6-26-2
Miedler L.
Martinez L.
6-26-3
Marchenko I.
Meligeni Alves F.
6-36-4
Safiullin R.
Vives Marcos P.
6-17-5
Murray A.
Sibille I.
6-06-1
Bega A.
Cachin P.
3-66-36-0
Seyboth Wild T.
Heliovaara H.
6-46-4
Heller P.
Cervantes Huegun I.
6-41-67-5
Van De Zandschulp B.
Jahn J.
6-25-76-0
Masur D.
Ilkel C.
6-36-4
Celikbilek A.
Grenier H.
2-66-47-63