Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Jeremy Jahn — Mallorca CH Round of 64

Mallorca CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED
Botic Van De Zandschulp
#55ATP
1743ELO
1711Hard ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 August 2019
hard
GER
Jeremy Jahn
36 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-2 5-7 6-0
Jahn J.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6562
Jahn J.
2701

Botic Van De Zandschulp defeated Jeremy Jahn 6-2 5-7 6-0 in the Mallorca CH round of 64 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Jahn J.

Jahn J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Van De Zandschulp B.Jahn J.
41
Serve
—
43
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.Jahn J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.6
3.0
Double faults / match·Even
3.9
3.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 64). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van De Zandschulp B.Jahn J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
77
12
Break points saved·Dominant
98
46
Break points won·Dominant
68
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
79
18
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
42

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Van De Zandschulp B.Jahn J.
Freshness·
91
—

Van De Zandschulp B.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Ruusuvuori E.[15]
Viola M.
6-06-1
Semi-finals
Viola M.
Masur D.
7-634-66-2
Ruusuvuori E.[15]
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
7-56-2
Quarter-finals
Masur D.
Marchenko I.
7-626-2
Viola M.
Kavcic B.
6-26-1
Ruusuvuori E.[15]
Martinez P.[9]
6-36-1
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
Rodionov J.
6-41-67-63
R16
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
Menendez Maceiras A.[12]
6-13-0
Viola M.
Murray A.
3-66-47-63
Masur D.
Miedler L.
2-66-47-610
Marchenko I.
Safiullin R.
6-16-2
Kavcic B.
Stakhovsky S.[7]
6-46-2
Martinez P.[9]
Van Rijthoven T.
6-37-65
Ruusuvuori E.[15]
Maden Y.[4]
6-46-3
Rodionov J.
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-756-36-4
R32
Van De Zandschulp B.
Vilella Martinez M.[14]
6-24-1
Stakhovsky S.[7]
Petrovic D.
3-67-636-6
Murray A.
Gombos N.[3]
6-36-4
Viola M.
Lopez Perez E.[16]
7-666-716-0
Masur D.
Bachinger M.[2]
2-66-06-4
Marchenko I.
Sela D.[11]
6-46-2
Van Rijthoven T.
Gaio F.[6]
7-663-66-4
Martinez P.[9]
Bega A.
6-46-3
Ruusuvuori E.[15]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-37-65
Maden Y.[4]
Celikbilek A.
5-77-57-5
Davidovich Fokina A.[5]
Heller P.
7-56-4
Menendez Maceiras A.[12]
Ignatik U.
6-36-2
Rodionov J.
Gojowczyk P.[1]
7-666-4
Miedler L.
Berlocq C.[13]
6-46-776-4
Safiullin R.
Rosol L.[8]
7-656-1
Kavcic B.
Halys Q.[10]
6-36-2
R64
Van Rijthoven T.
Sakharov G.
6-20-0
Rodionov J.
Alcaraz C.
6-46-4
Kavcic B.
Granollers G.
6-17-61
Viola M.
Gil F.
6-26-2
Miedler L.
Martinez L.
6-26-3
Marchenko I.
Meligeni Alves F.
6-36-4
Safiullin R.
Vives Marcos P.
6-17-5
Murray A.
Sibille I.
6-06-1
Bega A.
Cachin P.
3-66-36-0
Seyboth Wild T.
Heliovaara H.
6-46-4
Heller P.
Cervantes Huegun I.
6-41-67-5
Van De Zandschulp B.
Jahn J.
6-25-76-0
Masur D.
Ilkel C.
6-36-4
Celikbilek A.
Grenier H.
2-66-47-63