Jan Choinski vs Salvatore Caruso — Como CH Round of 32

Como CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jan Choinski
GBR
Jan Choinski
#75ATP
1686ELO
1652Clay ELO
$204kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
30 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 August 2019
clay
ITA2
Salvatore Caruso
33 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWWLWLWL
Choinski J.
7-6 6-2
Caruso S.
Choinski J.
7762
Caruso S.
6220

Jan Choinski defeated Salvatore Caruso 7-6 6-2 in the Como CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Salvatore Caruso came in defending the title.

Key context

  • Match story: Jan Choinski closed it out in two sets, 7–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Choinski J.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Caruso S.

Caruso S.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Choinski J.

Serve advantage — Choinski J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Choinski J.Caruso S.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
52%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
63%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.0
2.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.6
2.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Choinski J.Caruso S.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
55
41
Break points saved·Dominant
90
65
Break points won·Slight edge
20
30
Deciding sets·Slight edge
88
80
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
41
18

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Choinski J.Caruso S.
Freshness·
55
—

Choinski J.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 113 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Mena F.
Martin A.[6]
2-66-46-1
Semi-finals
Martin A.[6]
Travaglia S.[1]
6-26-1
Mena F.
Giannessi A.[8]
6-21-66-2
Quarter-finals
Mena F.
Sousa P.[3]
6-26-0
Martin A.[6]
Altmaier D.
7-640-3
Giannessi A.[8]
Popko D.
7-664-66-4
Travaglia S.[1]
Sels J.
6-46-4
R16
Popko D.
Choinski J.
2-66-26-1
Giannessi A.[8]
Ofner S.[10]
6-46-2
Sousa P.[3]
Tabilo A.[14]
6-756-46-0
Mena F.
Bagnis F.[9]
3-66-36-1
Martin A.[6]
Oconnell C.[12]
6-26-2
Altmaier D.
Rola B.[4]
3-66-36-4
Sels J.
Doumbia S.
6-17-64
Travaglia S.[1]
Galovic V.[13]
7-625-77-62
R32
Rola B.[4]
Zeppieri G.
7-56-4
Oconnell C.[12]
Quinzi G.
6-06-741-1
Travaglia S.[1]
Musetti L.
3-67-56-4
Choinski J.
Caruso S.[2]
7-626-2
Popko D.
Bellucci T.[15]
6-36-3
Ofner S.[10]
Escobar G.
6-37-64
Giannessi A.[8]
Tatlot J.
1-66-46-3
Sousa P.[3]
Reboul F.
6-26-2
Tabilo A.[14]
Molcan A.
6-47-66
Bagnis F.[9]
Pellegrino A.
6-32-66-2
Mena F.
Giustino L.[5]
6-36-2
Martin A.[6]
Bonadio R.
6-46-4
Altmaier D.
Karatsev A.[16]
1-67-656-3
Doumbia S.
Baldi F.[7]
3-67-626-2
Sels J.
Robredo T.[11]
5-77-56-3
Galovic V.[13]
Brancaccio R.
6-17-5
R64
Altmaier D.
Cerundolo F.
6-36-4
Molcan A.
Ehrat S.
7-676-4
Quinzi G.
Eriksson M.
7-56-4
Brancaccio R.
Iannaccone F.
7-56-0
Escobar G.
Moroni G.
6-06-1
Choinski J.
Barrios Vera T.
6-26-3
Tatlot J.
Huesler M.
2-67-56-3
Reboul F.
Gimeno Traver D.
6-13-66-3
Mena F.
Torebko P.
6-746-36-1
Bonadio R.
Muller A.
6-22-66-3
Zeppieri G.
Sultanov K.
6-26-0
Doumbia S.
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-4
Sels J.
Lenz J.
6-34-66-3
Musetti L.
Ocleppo J.
6-46-4
Popko D.
Guinard M.
6-46-3
Pellegrino A.
Forti F.
6-26-3