Viktor Galovic vs Raul Brancaccio — Como CH Round of 32

Como CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ITA13
Viktor Galovic
35 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 August 2019
clay
Raul Brancaccio
ITA
Raul Brancaccio
#230ATP
1492ELO
1465Clay ELO
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLLLW
Galovic V.
6-1 7-5
Brancaccio R.
Galovic V.
672
Brancaccio R.
150

Viktor Galovic defeated Raul Brancaccio 6-1 7-5 in the Como CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Viktor Galovic came in defending last year's semi-final.

Key context

  • Match story: Viktor Galovic came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 6–1 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Galovic V.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Brancaccio R.

Brancaccio R.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Galovic V.

Serve advantage — Brancaccio R.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Galovic V.Brancaccio R.
1st serve in·Even
63%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
47%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Slight edge
35%
42%
Break points saved·Slight edge
64%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
5.5
2.5
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (101 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Galovic V.Brancaccio R.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
25
11
Break points saved·Dominant
88
49
Break points won·Clear edge
3
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
35
9
Tiebreaks·Dominant
24
51

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Galovic V.Brancaccio R.
Freshness·
—
62

Brancaccio R.: 3 days rest · 3 matches, 78 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Mena F.
Martin A.[6]
2-66-46-1
Semi-finals
Martin A.[6]
Travaglia S.[1]
6-26-1
Mena F.
Giannessi A.[8]
6-21-66-2
Quarter-finals
Mena F.
Sousa P.[3]
6-26-0
Martin A.[6]
Altmaier D.
7-640-3
Giannessi A.[8]
Popko D.
7-664-66-4
Travaglia S.[1]
Sels J.
6-46-4
R16
Popko D.
Choinski J.
2-66-26-1
Giannessi A.[8]
Ofner S.[10]
6-46-2
Sousa P.[3]
Tabilo A.[14]
6-756-46-0
Mena F.
Bagnis F.[9]
3-66-36-1
Martin A.[6]
Oconnell C.[12]
6-26-2
Altmaier D.
Rola B.[4]
3-66-36-4
Sels J.
Doumbia S.
6-17-64
Travaglia S.[1]
Galovic V.[13]
7-625-77-62
R32
Rola B.[4]
Zeppieri G.
7-56-4
Oconnell C.[12]
Quinzi G.
6-06-741-1
Travaglia S.[1]
Musetti L.
3-67-56-4
Choinski J.
Caruso S.[2]
7-626-2
Popko D.
Bellucci T.[15]
6-36-3
Ofner S.[10]
Escobar G.
6-37-64
Giannessi A.[8]
Tatlot J.
1-66-46-3
Sousa P.[3]
Reboul F.
6-26-2
Tabilo A.[14]
Molcan A.
6-47-66
Bagnis F.[9]
Pellegrino A.
6-32-66-2
Mena F.
Giustino L.[5]
6-36-2
Martin A.[6]
Bonadio R.
6-46-4
Altmaier D.
Karatsev A.[16]
1-67-656-3
Doumbia S.
Baldi F.[7]
3-67-626-2
Sels J.
Robredo T.[11]
5-77-56-3
Galovic V.[13]
Brancaccio R.
6-17-5
R64
Altmaier D.
Cerundolo F.
6-36-4
Molcan A.
Ehrat S.
7-676-4
Quinzi G.
Eriksson M.
7-56-4
Brancaccio R.
Iannaccone F.
7-56-0
Escobar G.
Moroni G.
6-06-1
Choinski J.
Barrios Vera T.
6-26-3
Tatlot J.
Huesler M.
2-67-56-3
Reboul F.
Gimeno Traver D.
6-13-66-3
Mena F.
Torebko P.
6-746-36-1
Bonadio R.
Muller A.
6-22-66-3
Zeppieri G.
Sultanov K.
6-26-0
Doumbia S.
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-4
Sels J.
Lenz J.
6-34-66-3
Musetti L.
Ocleppo J.
6-46-4
Popko D.
Guinard M.
6-46-3
Pellegrino A.
Forti F.
6-26-3