Tung Lin Wu vs Yan Bai — Baotou CH Quarter-final

Baotou CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Tung Lin Wu
TPE8
Tung Lin Wu
#329ATP
1406ELO
1421Clay ELO
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 26 August 2019
clay
CHN4
Yan Bai
#1489ATP
37 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLLLLW
Wu T.
6-2 7-6
Bai Y.
Wu T.
6772
Bai Y.
2640

Tung Lin Wu defeated Yan Bai 6-2 7-6 in the Baotou CH quarter-final on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Tung Lin Wu closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wu T.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Bai Y.

Bai Y.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Wu T.

Serve advantage — Wu T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Wu T.Bai Y.
1st serve in·Slight edge
68%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
67%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
49%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
57%
Aces / match·Even
3.8
3.5
Double faults / match·Even
1.8
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 90). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wu T.Bai Y.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
10
18
Break points saved·Dominant
84
23
Break points won·Slight edge
6
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
6
73
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
4
17

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Wu T.Bai Y.
Freshness·
80
—

Wu T.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 16 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Duckworth J.[1]
Mukund S.[12]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Mukund S.[12]
Wu T.[8]
7-56-3
Duckworth J.[1]
Ferreira Silva F.[11]
6-36-4
Quarter-finals
Duckworth J.[1]
Oliveira G.[7]
5-0
Ferreira Silva F.[11]
Krstin P.[3]
6-34-1
Mukund S.[12]
Bourchier H.[15]
4-66-17-63
Wu T.[8]
Bai Y.[4]
6-27-64
R16
Wu T.[8]
Zhang Z.
6-36-4
Ferreira Silva F.[11]
Ortega Olmedo R.[5]
6-16-1
Krstin P.[3]
Hua R.
6-46-2
Oliveira G.[7]
Vukic A.[9]
6-43-66-0
Duckworth J.[1]
Yang T.[13]
3-67-646-1
Bourchier H.[15]
Tseng C.[17]
6-34-66-4
Mukund S.[12]
Uchida K.[6]
7-636-2
Bai Y.[4]
Nam J.[14]
6-34-67-5
R32
Ortega Olmedo R.[5]
Hamou M.
7-657-62
Bai Y.[4]
Sun F.
6-46-3
Mukund S.[12]
Yamasaki J.
6-06-2
Tseng C.[17]
Nedelko I.
6-36-3
Bourchier H.[15]
Rawat S.
7-56-2
Uchida K.[6]
Wang C.
6-27-64
Nam J.[14]
Kadhe A.
6-36-3
Zhang Z.
Crepatte B.[10]
6-46-2
Wu T.[8]
Wu D.
3-66-17-5
Ferreira Silva F.[11]
Takahashi Y.
6-36-0
Hua R.
Gabashvili T.[16]
6-33-67-613
Krstin P.[3]
Song E.
6-26-756-3
Oliveira G.[7]
Castelnuovo L.
6-46-4
Vukic A.[9]
Ochi M.
6-46-3
Yang T.[13]
Zekic M.
6-35-76-1
Duckworth J.[1]
Song M.
6-16-4
R64
Zekic M.
Takeuchi K.
4-66-36-4
Nedelko I.
Chung H.
6-26-3
Rawat S.
Cui J.
7-57-5
Sun F.
Liu H.
6-46-1
Kadhe A.
Wang H.
6-37-63
Zhang Z.
Wang C.
6-16-0
Wu D.
Grills J.
7-666-4
Hamou M.
Catarina L.
3-66-26-3
Takahashi Y.
Purcell R.
7-56-3
Hua R.
Fruttero J.
7-56-2
Castelnuovo L.
Tokuda R.
7-56-1
Song M.
Saville L.
6-47-65