Facundo Bagnis vs Andrea Pellegrino — Como CH Round of 32

Como CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
ARG9
Facundo Bagnis
#431ATP
1591ELO
1584Clay ELO
36 yrs · 183 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWWLWWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 26 August 2019
clay
Andrea Pellegrino
ITA
Andrea Pellegrino
#138ATP
1674ELO
1654Clay ELO
$320kYTD
$1.3MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLWLWWWL
Bagnis F.
6-3 2-6 6-2
Pellegrino A.
Bagnis F.
6262
Pellegrino A.
3621

Facundo Bagnis defeated Andrea Pellegrino 6-3 2-6 6-2 in the Como CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Andrea Pellegrino came in ranked #138.

Key context

  • Match story: Facundo Bagnis closed it out in three sets, 6–3 2–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Bagnis F.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Pellegrino A.

Pellegrino A.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Bagnis F.

Serve advantage — Bagnis F.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Bagnis F.Pellegrino A.
1st serve in·Even
63%
65%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
51%
Service points won·Even
63%
60%
Return points won·Even
40%
40%
Break points saved·Even
62%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.5
2.2
Double faults / match·Even
2.7
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (198 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Bagnis F.Pellegrino A.
Clutch Rating·Even
54
55
Break points saved·Dominant
92
67
Break points won·Even
35
35
Deciding sets·Slight edge
89
82
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Bagnis F.Pellegrino A.
Freshness·
—
86

Pellegrino A.: 6 days rest · 2 matches, 47 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Mena F.
Martin A.[6]
2-66-46-1
Semi-finals
Martin A.[6]
Travaglia S.[1]
6-26-1
Mena F.
Giannessi A.[8]
6-21-66-2
Quarter-finals
Mena F.
Sousa P.[3]
6-26-0
Martin A.[6]
Altmaier D.
7-640-3
Giannessi A.[8]
Popko D.
7-664-66-4
Travaglia S.[1]
Sels J.
6-46-4
R16
Popko D.
Choinski J.
2-66-26-1
Giannessi A.[8]
Ofner S.[10]
6-46-2
Sousa P.[3]
Tabilo A.[14]
6-756-46-0
Mena F.
Bagnis F.[9]
3-66-36-1
Martin A.[6]
Oconnell C.[12]
6-26-2
Altmaier D.
Rola B.[4]
3-66-36-4
Sels J.
Doumbia S.
6-17-64
Travaglia S.[1]
Galovic V.[13]
7-625-77-62
R32
Rola B.[4]
Zeppieri G.
7-56-4
Oconnell C.[12]
Quinzi G.
6-06-741-1
Travaglia S.[1]
Musetti L.
3-67-56-4
Choinski J.
Caruso S.[2]
7-626-2
Popko D.
Bellucci T.[15]
6-36-3
Ofner S.[10]
Escobar G.
6-37-64
Giannessi A.[8]
Tatlot J.
1-66-46-3
Sousa P.[3]
Reboul F.
6-26-2
Tabilo A.[14]
Molcan A.
6-47-66
Bagnis F.[9]
Pellegrino A.
6-32-66-2
Mena F.
Giustino L.[5]
6-36-2
Martin A.[6]
Bonadio R.
6-46-4
Altmaier D.
Karatsev A.[16]
1-67-656-3
Doumbia S.
Baldi F.[7]
3-67-626-2
Sels J.
Robredo T.[11]
5-77-56-3
Galovic V.[13]
Brancaccio R.
6-17-5
R64
Altmaier D.
Cerundolo F.
6-36-4
Molcan A.
Ehrat S.
7-676-4
Quinzi G.
Eriksson M.
7-56-4
Brancaccio R.
Iannaccone F.
7-56-0
Escobar G.
Moroni G.
6-06-1
Choinski J.
Barrios Vera T.
6-26-3
Tatlot J.
Huesler M.
2-67-56-3
Reboul F.
Gimeno Traver D.
6-13-66-3
Mena F.
Torebko P.
6-746-36-1
Bonadio R.
Muller A.
6-22-66-3
Zeppieri G.
Sultanov K.
6-26-0
Doumbia S.
Arnaboldi A.
6-46-4
Sels J.
Lenz J.
6-34-66-3
Musetti L.
Ocleppo J.
6-46-4
Popko D.
Guinard M.
6-46-3
Pellegrino A.
Forti F.
6-26-3