Johannes Haerteis vs Juan Pablo Ficovich — L'Aquila CH Round of 16

L'Aquila CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
GER
Johannes Haerteis
30 yrs · 196 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 19 August 2019
clay
Juan Pablo Ficovich
ARG
Juan Pablo Ficovich
#224ATP
1415ELO
1383Clay ELO
$100kYTD
$984kCAREER
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
Haerteis J.
6-3 7-6
Ficovich J.
Haerteis J.
6782
Ficovich J.
3660

Johannes Haerteis defeated Juan Pablo Ficovich 6-3 7-6 in the L'Aquila CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Johannes Haerteis came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Haerteis J.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Ficovich J.

Ficovich J.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Haerteis J.

Serve advantage — Ficovich J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Haerteis J.Ficovich J.
1st serve in·Even
61%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
51%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
59%
Aces / match·Even
4.4
4.3
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.1
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (117 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Haerteis J.Ficovich J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
38
16
Break points saved·Slight edge
71
76
Break points won·Even
12
9
Deciding sets·Dominant
76
27
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
25
5

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Haerteis J.Ficovich J.
Freshness·
—
86

Ficovich J.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 33 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Collarini A.
Martin A.[1]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Martin A.[1]
Popko D.[3]
6-36-0
Collarini A.
Taberner C.
4-67-647-64
Quarter-finals
Martin A.[1]
Clezar G.
3-67-626-4
Popko D.[3]
Haerteis J.
7-686-2
Taberner C.
Vukic A.[9]
6-36-1
Collarini A.
Cerundolo F.[14]
2-66-27-66
R16
Martin A.[1]
Torebko P.
6-26-4
Vukic A.[9]
Kotov P.[5]
6-46-3
Cerundolo F.[14]
Seyboth Wild T.
6-46-3
Collarini A.
Ferreira Silva F.[8]
6-43-66-3
Haerteis J.
Ficovich J.
6-37-66
Popko D.[3]
Zopp J.
6-37-65
Clezar G.
Mena F.[11]
6-736-46-4
Taberner C.
Huesler M.[15]
7-56-2
R32
Martin A.[1]
Quinzi G.
6-36-2
Seyboth Wild T.
Bellucci T.[4]
7-57-64
Ferreira Silva F.[8]
Alcaraz C.
6-34-66-3
Huesler M.[15]
Gabashvili T.
6-16-3
Vukic A.[9]
Escobar G.
6-36-4
Cerundolo F.[14]
Di Nicola G.
5-77-646-3
Collarini A.
Brancaccio R.[10]
6-33-66-3
Haerteis J.
Serdarusic N.[6]
7-656-3
Zopp J.
Mukund S.[13]
7-56-4
Popko D.[3]
Sultanov K.
6-36-4
Clezar G.
Karatsev A.[7]
7-56-4
Mena F.[11]
Griekspoor S.
7-56-2
Torebko P.
Barrios Vera T.[16]
3-66-36-2
Ficovich J.
Moroni G.[12]
6-44-66-4
Taberner C.
Tabilo A.[2]
6-46-776-0
Kotov P.[5]
Vavassori A.
6-27-68
R64
Gabashvili T.
Valkusz M.
4-61-0
Vavassori A.
Sels J.
7-53-67-62
Di Nicola G.
Pancaldi L.
6-06-2
Sultanov K.
Musetti L.
6-17-63
Zopp J.
Jomby T.
6-26-3
Escobar G.
Forti F.
6-33-67-64
Collarini A.
Rodriguez C.
6-26-1
Alcaraz C.
Oconnell C.
6-46-2
Haerteis J.
Bonadio R.
6-46-4
Ficovich J.
Cuevas M.
6-737-656-1
Clezar G.
Pavic A.
6-36-2
Griekspoor S.
Gomez Herrera C.
3-67-687-66
Torebko P.
Fanselow S.
7-56-3
Quinzi G.
Gonzalez A.
6-36-1
Seyboth Wild T.
Brkic T.
6-26-4
Taberner C.
Gimeno Traver D.
7-657-5