Zsombor Piros vs Nino Serdarusic — Cordenons CH Round of 32

Cordenons CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Zsombor Piros
HUN
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1621Clay ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 August 2019
clay
CRO10
Nino Serdarusic
#1471ATP
29 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLWLL
Piros Z.
6-3 7-5
Serdarusic N.
Piros Z.
672
Serdarusic N.
350

Zsombor Piros defeated Nino Serdarusic 6-3 7-5 in the Cordenons CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Zsombor Piros came in ranked #120.

Key context

  • Match story: Zsombor Piros closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Piros Z.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Serdarusic N.

Serdarusic N.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Serve advantage — Piros Z.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Piros Z.Serdarusic N.
1st serve in·Even
59%
62%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
50%
Service points won·Even
61%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
36%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.1
4.9
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.7
1.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Piros Z.Serdarusic N.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
8
Break points saved·Clear edge
84
66
Break points won·Dominant
32
5
Deciding sets·Dominant
85
10
Tiebreaks·Dominant
48
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Piros Z.Serdarusic N.
Freshness·
54
—

Piros Z.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Oconnell C.
Jahn J.
7-56-2
Semi-finals
Oconnell C.
Piros Z.
7-636-2
Jahn J.
Eriksson M.[14]
6-16-1
Quarter-finals
Piros Z.
Seyboth Wild T.
6-46-4
Oconnell C.
Cerundolo F.[15]
6-11-66-3
Jahn J.
Moroni G.[11]
6-24-67-62
Eriksson M.[14]
Collarini A.
6-34-66-4
R16
Oconnell C.
Brkic T.
6-46-2
Seyboth Wild T.
Martin A.[2]
6-26-2
Piros Z.
Kavcic B.[6]
1-66-36-3
Cerundolo F.[15]
Balazs A.[3]
3-66-36-2
Moroni G.[11]
Tabilo A.[5]
7-612-66-3
Jahn J.
Basso A.
6-26-4
Collarini A.
Luz O.
7-56-4
Eriksson M.[14]
Lorenzi P.[1]
6-43-66-3
R32
Cerundolo F.[15]
Tiurnev E.
5-76-47-65
Moroni G.[11]
Musetti L.
6-767-654-1
Collarini A.
Vukic A.[7]
6-46-4
Luz O.
Popko D.[9]
7-56-3
Martin A.[2]
Gonzalez A.
6-27-5
Seyboth Wild T.
Barrios Vera T.[16]
6-16-756-4
Piros Z.
Serdarusic N.[10]
6-37-5
Kavcic B.[6]
Forti F.
6-37-62
Balazs A.[3]
Arnaboldi F.
6-16-3
Brkic T.
Olivo R.[12]
7-645-76-3
Oconnell C.
Inserra N.
6-26-3
Tabilo A.[5]
Pellegrino A.
6-36-786-1
Basso A.
Molcan A.[13]
7-653-67-66
Jahn J.
Ruusuvuori E.[4]
6-46-4
Eriksson M.[14]
Dalla Valle E.
4-66-37-68
Lorenzi P.[1]
Clezar G.
2-67-57-65
R64
Musetti L.
Bonzi B.
6-16-4
Gonzalez A.
Pavic A.
6-36-2
Arnaboldi F.
Bonadio R.
6-17-69
Seyboth Wild T.
Gimeno Traver D.
7-656-1
Forti F.
Balzerani R.
6-44-66-2
Brkic T.
Zeppieri G.
6-36-3
Oconnell C.
Tseng C.
1-66-47-5
Pellegrino A.
Doumbia S.
6-26-4
Basso A.
Meligeni Alves F.
7-633-66-2
Jahn J.
Sun F.
6-36-2
Luz O.
Fonio G.
6-47-63
Dalla Valle E.
Berrettini J.
6-46-4
Tiurnev E.
Boluda Purkiss C.
7-656-2
Piros Z.
Granollers G.
6-36-1
Collarini A.
Quinzi G.
6-06-2
Clezar G.
Reboul F.
6-26-2