Daniel Munoz de la Nava vs Inigo Cervantes Huegun — Meerbusch CH Round of 64

Meerbusch CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
ESP
Daniel Munoz de la Nava
44 yrs · 178 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 August 2019
clay
ESP
Inigo Cervantes Huegun
36 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLLLL
Munoz de la Nava D.
6-2 6-4
Cervantes Huegun I.
Munoz de la Nava D.
662
Cervantes Huegun I.
240

Daniel Munoz de la Nava defeated Inigo Cervantes Huegun 6-2 6-4 in the Meerbusch CH round of 64 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Inigo Cervantes Huegun came in leading the head-to-head 4–0. Daniel Munoz de la Nava claimed a first win over Inigo Cervantes Huegun in five meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 4–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–4
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2016-04-25EstorilR32clayInigo Cervantes Huegun6-4 6-1
2015-11-23Challenger Tour FinalsRRclayInigo Cervantes Huegun4-6 7-6(3) 7-5
2015-11-23Challenger Tour FinalsFclayInigo Cervantes Huegun6-3 3-6 7-6(4)
2015-07-27HamburgQ1clayInigo Cervantes Huegun6-4 3-6 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Munoz de la Nava D.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Cervantes Huegun I.

Cervantes Huegun I.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Munoz de la Nava D.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Munoz de la Nava D.Cervantes Huegun I.
1st serve in·Slight edge
57%
51%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
43%
47%
Service points won·Even
57%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
52%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
3.1
5.8
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.4
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (7 vs 48). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Munoz de la Nava D.Cervantes Huegun I.
Clutch Rating·Even
13
13
Break points saved·Slight edge
61
71
Break points won·Even
20
19
Deciding sets·Even
14
15
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
28
9

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Sousa P.[1]
Krstin P.[3]
7-644-66-3
Semi-finals
Krstin P.[3]
Choinski J.[7]
6-46-1
Sousa P.[1]
Taberner C.
4-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Choinski J.[7]
Wessels L.
6-36-3
Krstin P.[3]
Ortega Olmedo R.[6]
6-06-2
Taberner C.
Wang T.
6-16-0
Sousa P.[1]
Sels J.
6-26-716-3
R16
Krstin P.[3]
Mena F.
6-26-0
Taberner C.
Hassan B.[16]
7-606-3
Wessels L.
Griekspoor S.
7-57-5
Choinski J.[7]
Karatsev A.[10]
6-46-747-66
Ortega Olmedo R.[6]
Brancaccio R.[11]
6-46-746-4
Wang T.
Bellucci T.[8]
6-16-2
Sels J.
Kotov P.[9]
6-26-2
Sousa P.[1]
Barranco Cosano J.[13]
6-46-1
R32
Krstin P.[3]
Gerch L.
6-16-4
Wang T.
Crepatte B.[12]
6-46-1
Hassan B.[16]
Haerteis J.
4-66-10-0
Barranco Cosano J.[13]
Lenz J.
7-56-2
Griekspoor S.
Clarke J.[2]
6-36-4
Bellucci T.[8]
Breitbach K.
6-26-4
Ortega Olmedo R.[6]
Pavlasek A.
6-36-4
Choinski J.[7]
Munoz de la Nava D.
6-26-4
Wessels L.
Huesler M.[15]
6-46-3
Mena F.
Roca Batalla O.[14]
6-46-0
Brancaccio R.[11]
Vanneste J.
7-676-2
Taberner C.
Lamasine T.[4]
6-746-46-2
Sels J.
Hernandez J.[5]
6-16-2
Kotov P.[9]
Dima D.
3-67-656-4
Sousa P.[1]
Maamoun K.
6-37-5
Karatsev A.[10]
Satral J.
4-66-16-2
R64
Wessels L.
Gakhov I.
7-647-61
Satral J.
Nedelko I.
7-687-65
Gerch L.
Safranek V.
6-46-2
Munoz de la Nava D.
Cervantes Huegun I.
6-26-4
Wang T.
Cuevas M.
6-16-2
Dima D.
Metreveli A.
6-22-67-61
Breitbach K.
Daljev P.
6-17-5
Griekspoor S.
Fanselow S.
6-36-4
Mena F.
Ojeda Lara R.
3-66-46-4
Vanneste J.
Rosenkranz M.
6-46-3
Pavlasek A.
De Bakker T.
7-636-3
Haerteis J.
Esteve Lobato E.
6-47-5
Taberner C.
Altmaier D.
6-36-4
Sels J.
Heyman C.
6-23-66-1
Lenz J.
Squire H.
6-16-3
Maamoun K.
Tatlot J.
6-46-3