Jan Choinski vs Daniel Munoz de la Nava — Meerbusch CH Round of 32

Meerbusch CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
Jan Choinski
GBR7
Jan Choinski
#100ATP
1686ELO
1652Clay ELO
$204kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
30 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWLWLWWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 12 August 2019
clay
ESP
Daniel Munoz de la Nava
44 yrs · 178 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWLLLW
Choinski J.
6-2 6-4
Munoz de la Nava D.
Choinski J.
662
Munoz de la Nava D.
240

Jan Choinski defeated Daniel Munoz de la Nava 6-2 6-4 in the Meerbusch CH round of 32 on clay. The result followed the form book — Jan Choinski came in defending last year's final.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Choinski J.serving73% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Munoz de la Nava D.

Munoz de la Nava D.serving69% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Choinski J.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Choinski J.Munoz de la Nava D.
1st serve in·Slight edge
65%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
52%
46%
Service points won·Even
62%
59%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Clear edge
63%
49%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.0
3.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
1.6
2.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 7). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Choinski J.Munoz de la Nava D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
55
13
Break points saved·Dominant
90
61
Break points won·Even
20
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
87
14
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
41
28

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Choinski J.Munoz de la Nava D.
Freshness·
60
—

Choinski J.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 67 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Sousa P.[1]
Krstin P.[3]
7-644-66-3
Semi-finals
Krstin P.[3]
Choinski J.[7]
6-46-1
Sousa P.[1]
Taberner C.
4-66-36-4
Quarter-finals
Choinski J.[7]
Wessels L.
6-36-3
Krstin P.[3]
Ortega Olmedo R.[6]
6-06-2
Taberner C.
Wang T.
6-16-0
Sousa P.[1]
Sels J.
6-26-716-3
R16
Krstin P.[3]
Mena F.
6-26-0
Taberner C.
Hassan B.[16]
7-606-3
Wessels L.
Griekspoor S.
7-57-5
Choinski J.[7]
Karatsev A.[10]
6-46-747-66
Ortega Olmedo R.[6]
Brancaccio R.[11]
6-46-746-4
Wang T.
Bellucci T.[8]
6-16-2
Sels J.
Kotov P.[9]
6-26-2
Sousa P.[1]
Barranco Cosano J.[13]
6-46-1
R32
Krstin P.[3]
Gerch L.
6-16-4
Wang T.
Crepatte B.[12]
6-46-1
Hassan B.[16]
Haerteis J.
4-66-10-0
Barranco Cosano J.[13]
Lenz J.
7-56-2
Griekspoor S.
Clarke J.[2]
6-36-4
Bellucci T.[8]
Breitbach K.
6-26-4
Ortega Olmedo R.[6]
Pavlasek A.
6-36-4
Choinski J.[7]
Munoz de la Nava D.
6-26-4
Wessels L.
Huesler M.[15]
6-46-3
Mena F.
Roca Batalla O.[14]
6-46-0
Brancaccio R.[11]
Vanneste J.
7-676-2
Taberner C.
Lamasine T.[4]
6-746-46-2
Sels J.
Hernandez J.[5]
6-16-2
Kotov P.[9]
Dima D.
3-67-656-4
Sousa P.[1]
Maamoun K.
6-37-5
Karatsev A.[10]
Satral J.
4-66-16-2
R64
Wessels L.
Gakhov I.
7-647-61
Satral J.
Nedelko I.
7-687-65
Gerch L.
Safranek V.
6-46-2
Munoz de la Nava D.
Cervantes Huegun I.
6-26-4
Wang T.
Cuevas M.
6-16-2
Dima D.
Metreveli A.
6-22-67-61
Breitbach K.
Daljev P.
6-17-5
Griekspoor S.
Fanselow S.
6-36-4
Mena F.
Ojeda Lara R.
3-66-46-4
Vanneste J.
Rosenkranz M.
6-46-3
Pavlasek A.
De Bakker T.
7-636-3
Haerteis J.
Esteve Lobato E.
6-47-5
Taberner C.
Altmaier D.
6-36-4
Sels J.
Heyman C.
6-23-66-1
Lenz J.
Squire H.
6-16-3
Maamoun K.
Tatlot J.
6-46-3