Emil Ruusuvuori vs Pedro Sakamoto — Augsburg CH Round of 64

Augsburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
FIN
Emil Ruusuvuori
#787ATP
1606ELO
1558Clay ELO
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 August 2019
clay
Pedro Sakamoto
BRA
Pedro Sakamoto
#494ATP
1281ELO
1266Clay ELO
33 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWLL
Ruusuvuori E.
6-2 6-1
Sakamoto P.
Ruusuvuori E.
662
Sakamoto P.
210

Emil Ruusuvuori defeated Pedro Sakamoto 6-2 6-1 in the Augsburg CH round of 64 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ruusuvuori E.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Sakamoto P.

Sakamoto P.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Ruusuvuori E.

Serve advantage — Ruusuvuori E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ruusuvuori E.Sakamoto P.
1st serve in·Even
65%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
50%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.7
2.7
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.9
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruusuvuori E.Sakamoto P.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
72
13
Break points saved·Dominant
97
48
Break points won·Dominant
48
22
Deciding sets·Dominant
80
11
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
57

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ruusuvuori E.Sakamoto P.
Freshness·
—
94

Sakamoto P.: 7 days rest · 1 match, 13 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Hanfmann Y.[15]
Ruusuvuori E.
2-66-47-5
Semi-finals
Hanfmann Y.[15]
Mena F.
6-16-1
Ruusuvuori E.
Lenz J.
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Hanfmann Y.[15]
Vanneste J.
6-26-1
Mena F.
Altmaier D.
6-47-62
Lenz J.
Garcia Lopez G.[7]
7-643-67-5
Ruusuvuori E.
Martinez P.[6]
6-37-65
R16
Garcia Lopez G.[7]
Taberner C.
6-35-76-2
Lenz J.
Vilella Martinez M.[13]
6-16-2
Hanfmann Y.[15]
Bachinger M.[2]
6-756-26-1
Vanneste J.
Guinard M.
6-10-66-4
Altmaier D.
Baldi F.[3]
7-636-3
Mena F.
Hassan B.
4-66-16-0
Martinez P.[6]
Ofner S.[9]
6-46-1
Ruusuvuori E.
Laaksonen H.[1]
6-36-4
R32
Hassan B.
Rosol L.[5]
6-46-4
Guinard M.
Moraing M.[8]
6-45-71-2
Ruusuvuori E.
Zapata Miralles B.[14]
6-34-66-3
Taberner C.
Lestienne C.[12]
6-26-1
Bachinger M.[2]
Balaji N.
6-46-1
Hanfmann Y.[15]
Molcan A.
4-66-26-1
Vanneste J.
Clarke J.[11]
6-36-2
Baldi F.[3]
Blancaneaux G.
7-656-4
Altmaier D.
Miedler L.[16]
6-36-3
Mena F.
Guttau N.
6-47-5
Garcia Lopez G.[7]
Olivo R.
7-626-4
Vilella Martinez M.[13]
Heller P.
6-26-2
Lenz J.
Sundar Prashanth N.
7-56-1
Martinez P.[6]
Jahn J.
7-54-67-64
Ofner S.[9]
Zopp J.
6-46-2
Laaksonen H.[1]
Wessels L.
6-26-4
R64
Ruusuvuori E.
Sakamoto P.
6-26-1
Zopp J.
Metreveli A.
6-16-2
Heller P.
Roca Batalla O.
7-56-746-4
Wessels L.
Haerteis J.
7-667-5
Balaji N.
Strombachs R.
6-16-1
Molcan A.
Dima D.
6-26-746-4
Vanneste J.
Ignatik U.
6-47-5
Guinard M.
Brancaccio R.
6-36-4
Blancaneaux G.
Pavlasek A.
6-16-4
Altmaier D.
Mukund S.
4-66-17-66
Mena F.
Lemstra K.
6-46-2
Hassan B.
Wang T.
6-26-4
Olivo R.
Choinski J.
6-46-4
Taberner C.
Rinderknech A.
6-26-4
Lenz J.
Esteve Lobato E.
4-66-46-4
Jahn J.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-26-3