Zsombor Piros vs Chun Hsin Tseng — Manerbio CH Round of 16

Manerbio CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Zsombor Piros
HUN
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1621Clay ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 August 2019
clay
Chun Hsin Tseng
TPE
Chun Hsin Tseng
#234ATP
1554ELO
1541Clay ELO
$99kYTD
$1.7MCAREER
24 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLWLWLW
Piros Z.
4-6 6-2 6-3
Tseng C.
Piros Z.
4662
Tseng C.
6231

Zsombor Piros defeated Chun Hsin Tseng 4-6 6-2 6-3 in the Manerbio CH round of 16 on clay. The result followed the form book — Zsombor Piros came in ranked #120.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Piros Z.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Tseng C.

Tseng C.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Piros Z.Tseng C.
1st serve in·Even
59%
58%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
68%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
51%
Service points won·Even
61%
61%
Return points won·Even
41%
39%
Break points saved·Even
61%
61%
Aces / match·Even
3.1
3.0
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Piros Z.Tseng C.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
26
Break points saved·Even
84
83
Break points won·Clear edge
32
15
Deciding sets·Dominant
85
31
Tiebreaks·Dominant
48
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Piros Z.Tseng C.
Freshness·
54
—

Piros Z.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Gaio F.[5]
Lorenzi P.[1]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Lorenzi P.[1]
Gabashvili T.
6-46-4
Gaio F.[5]
Coria F.[4]
1-66-46-2
Quarter-finals
Gaio F.[5]
Giustino L.[2]
4-2
Gabashvili T.
Arnaboldi A.[8]
7-624-66-3
Coria F.[4]
Piros Z.
6-46-4
Lorenzi P.[1]
Doumbia S.
1-67-56-4
R16
Gabashvili T.
King E.[14]
6-36-4
Giustino L.[2]
Kotov P.[13]
1-66-47-5
Gaio F.[5]
Serdarusic N.[11]
3-66-36-4
Coria F.[4]
Griekspoor S.
7-56-1
Piros Z.
Tseng C.
4-66-26-3
Arnaboldi A.[8]
Cerundolo F.
6-26-3
Doumbia S.
Pellegrino A.
5-76-36-4
Lorenzi P.[1]
Collarini A.[16]
6-46-3
R32
Arnaboldi A.[8]
Granollers G.
6-36-3
King E.[14]
Zeppieri G.
6-36-3
Lorenzi P.[1]
Torebko P.
2-66-16-4
Collarini A.[16]
Boluda Purkiss C.
6-06-3
Giustino L.[2]
Cuevas M.
7-633-66-3
Kotov P.[13]
Durasovic V.
0-66-26-3
Gaio F.[5]
Reboul F.
4-66-37-61
Piros Z.
Cacic N.
2-66-46-4
Cerundolo F.
Ferreira Silva F.[12]
6-43-66-1
Gabashvili T.
Coppejans K.[3]
5-76-36-3
Doumbia S.
Galovic V.[7]
6-16-2
Pellegrino A.
Oliveira G.[10]
6-16-4
Serdarusic N.[11]
Gakhov I.
6-36-3
Coria F.[4]
Etcheverry T.
7-644-66-4
Griekspoor S.
Tabilo A.[15]
6-36-2
Tseng C.
Safwat M.[9]
6-16-3
R64
Doumbia S.
Pavic A.
7-600-0
Piros Z.
Brkic T.
7-643-66-2
Durasovic V.
Speziali F.
6-17-64
Reboul F.
Barrientos N.
6-46-3
Etcheverry T.
Bega A.
6-36-2
Griekspoor S.
Bosio G.
6-37-61
Cerundolo F.
Rune H.
7-646-0
Zeppieri G.
Setkic A.
6-47-63
Gabashvili T.
Berrettini J.
6-06-756-3
Pellegrino A.
Gomez Herrera C.
6-24-67-67
Torebko P.
Cervantes Huegun I.
4-66-16-1
Cuevas M.
Bortolotti M.
7-646-1
Gakhov I.
Musetti L.
6-37-65
Tseng C.
Dalla Valle E.
7-636-4
Granollers G.
Van De Zandschulp B.
2-66-46-4