Max Purcell vs Michael Mmoh — Aptos CH Round of 32

Aptos CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
AUS
Max Purcell
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 August 2019
hard
Michael Mmoh
USA8
Michael Mmoh
#188ATP
1613ELO
1599Hard ELO
$85kYTD
$2.4MCAREER
28 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLLWWWL
Purcell M.
7-5 1-6 6-4
Mmoh M.
Purcell M.
7162
Mmoh M.
5641

Max Purcell defeated Michael Mmoh 7-5 1-6 6-4 in the Aptos CH round of 32 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Michael Mmoh came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 16. Max Purcell claimed a first win over Michael Mmoh in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Max Purcell closed it out in three sets, 7–5 1–6 6–4.

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-04-01HoustonR16clayMichael Mmoh6-2 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Purcell M.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Mmoh M.

Mmoh M.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Purcell M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Purcell M.Mmoh M.
1st serve in·Slight edge
60%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
73%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Even
64%
63%
Return points won·Even
37%
39%
Break points saved·Even
62%
62%
Aces / match·Clear edge
7.6
6.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.9
3.8

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 199). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Purcell M.Mmoh M.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
59
66
Break points saved·Even
92
91
Break points won·Clear edge
10
31
Deciding sets·Slight edge
84
90
Tiebreaks·Even
81
77

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Purcell M.Mmoh M.
Freshness·
—
95

Mmoh M.: 13 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Johnson S.[2]
Koepfer D.[4]
6-47-64
Semi-finals
Johnson S.[2]
Gerasimov E.[6]
6-26-1
Koepfer D.[4]
Escobedo E.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Koepfer D.[4]
Giron M.[7]
6-16-4
Johnson S.[2]
Soeda G.[10]
6-37-64
Escobedo E.
Dzumhur D.[1]
6-13-67-5
Gerasimov E.[6]
Daniel T.[3]
6-36-4
R16
Koepfer D.[4]
Sarkissian A.
6-37-62
Escobedo E.
Fratangelo B.[5]
7-626-757-612
Soeda G.[10]
Purcell M.
7-636-3
Johnson S.[2]
Broady L.
7-56-1
Dzumhur D.[1]
Lacko L.
6-766-37-69
Daniel T.[3]
Redlicki M.
3-67-57-63
Gerasimov E.[6]
Gomez E.[12]
6-37-5
Giron M.[7]
Gojo B.
3-67-626-4
R32
Purcell M.
Mmoh M.[8]
7-51-66-4
Lacko L.
Eubanks C.[13]
7-617-65
Redlicki M.
Janvier M.
6-36-4
Gerasimov E.[6]
Kokkinakis T.
7-626-4
Gomez E.[12]
Santillan A.
7-647-5
Escobedo E.
Krueger M.[11]
6-46-766-2
Koepfer D.[4]
Li Z.
6-36-4
Johnson S.[2]
Quiroz R.
6-16-2
Soeda G.[10]
Hoyt E.
7-637-5
Daniel T.[3]
Riffice S.
6-46-0
Gojo B.
Couacaud E.[9]
1-66-26-2
Dzumhur D.[1]
Smith K.
6-46-4
Sarkissian A.
Bemelmans R.[16]
6-726-16-2
Giron M.[7]
Redlicki M.
6-26-3
Broady L.
Ramanathan R.[14]
7-626-4
Fratangelo B.[5]
Sinner J.
7-666-3
R64
Quiroz R.
Harris A.
6-36-3
Sarkissian A.
Harrison R.
5-4
Sinner J.
Verbeek S.
3-67-636-2
Kokkinakis T.
Uzhylovsky V.
6-21-0
Janvier M.
Lee D.
6-44-66-4
Redlicki M.
Glasspool L.
7-656-4
Gojo B.
Arevalo M.
6-46-1
Purcell M.
Cressy M.
7-57-67
Hoyt E.
Aragone J.
6-46-2
Santillan A.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-36-4
Li Z.
Ward J.
6-46-2
Escobedo E.
Brooksby J.
6-26-2
Lacko L.
Young D.
6-46-2
Smith K.
Holt B.
6-46-3
Broady L.
Novikov D.
6-24-66-0
Riffice S.
Watanuki Y.
6-26-4