Emil Ruusuvuori vs Bernabe Zapata Miralles — Augsburg CH Round of 32

Augsburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
FIN
Emil Ruusuvuori
#787ATP
1606ELO
1558Clay ELO
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 August 2019
clay
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
ESP14
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
1413ELO
1407Clay ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
Ruusuvuori E.
6-3 4-6 6-3
Zapata Miralles B.
Ruusuvuori E.
6462
Zapata Miralles B.
3631

Emil Ruusuvuori defeated Bernabe Zapata Miralles 6-3 4-6 6-3 in the Augsburg CH round of 32 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Emil Ruusuvuori closed it out in three sets, 6–3 4–6 6–3.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Ruusuvuori E.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Zapata Miralles B.

Zapata Miralles B.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Ruusuvuori E.

Serve advantage — Ruusuvuori E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ruusuvuori E.Zapata Miralles B.
1st serve in·Even
65%
67%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
63%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
47%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
57%
Return points won·Even
38%
41%
Break points saved·Slight edge
61%
55%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.7
1.6
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.9
2.0

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruusuvuori E.Zapata Miralles B.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
72
49
Break points saved·Clear edge
97
74
Break points won·Dominant
48
80
Deciding sets·Clear edge
80
56
Tiebreaks·Dominant
86
3

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Hanfmann Y.[15]
Ruusuvuori E.
2-66-47-5
Semi-finals
Hanfmann Y.[15]
Mena F.
6-16-1
Ruusuvuori E.
Lenz J.
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Hanfmann Y.[15]
Vanneste J.
6-26-1
Mena F.
Altmaier D.
6-47-62
Lenz J.
Garcia Lopez G.[7]
7-643-67-5
Ruusuvuori E.
Martinez P.[6]
6-37-65
R16
Garcia Lopez G.[7]
Taberner C.
6-35-76-2
Lenz J.
Vilella Martinez M.[13]
6-16-2
Hanfmann Y.[15]
Bachinger M.[2]
6-756-26-1
Vanneste J.
Guinard M.
6-10-66-4
Altmaier D.
Baldi F.[3]
7-636-3
Mena F.
Hassan B.
4-66-16-0
Martinez P.[6]
Ofner S.[9]
6-46-1
Ruusuvuori E.
Laaksonen H.[1]
6-36-4
R32
Hassan B.
Rosol L.[5]
6-46-4
Guinard M.
Moraing M.[8]
6-45-71-2
Ruusuvuori E.
Zapata Miralles B.[14]
6-34-66-3
Taberner C.
Lestienne C.[12]
6-26-1
Bachinger M.[2]
Balaji N.
6-46-1
Hanfmann Y.[15]
Molcan A.
4-66-26-1
Vanneste J.
Clarke J.[11]
6-36-2
Baldi F.[3]
Blancaneaux G.
7-656-4
Altmaier D.
Miedler L.[16]
6-36-3
Mena F.
Guttau N.
6-47-5
Garcia Lopez G.[7]
Olivo R.
7-626-4
Vilella Martinez M.[13]
Heller P.
6-26-2
Lenz J.
Sundar Prashanth N.
7-56-1
Martinez P.[6]
Jahn J.
7-54-67-64
Ofner S.[9]
Zopp J.
6-46-2
Laaksonen H.[1]
Wessels L.
6-26-4
R64
Ruusuvuori E.
Sakamoto P.
6-26-1
Zopp J.
Metreveli A.
6-16-2
Heller P.
Roca Batalla O.
7-56-746-4
Wessels L.
Haerteis J.
7-667-5
Balaji N.
Strombachs R.
6-16-1
Molcan A.
Dima D.
6-26-746-4
Vanneste J.
Ignatik U.
6-47-5
Guinard M.
Brancaccio R.
6-36-4
Blancaneaux G.
Pavlasek A.
6-16-4
Altmaier D.
Mukund S.
4-66-17-66
Mena F.
Lemstra K.
6-46-2
Hassan B.
Wang T.
6-26-4
Olivo R.
Choinski J.
6-46-4
Taberner C.
Rinderknech A.
6-26-4
Lenz J.
Esteve Lobato E.
4-66-46-4
Jahn J.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-26-3