Emil Ruusuvuori vs Pedro Martinez — Augsburg CH Quarter-final

Augsburg CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
FIN
Emil Ruusuvuori
#787ATP
1606ELO
1558Clay ELO
27 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLWWL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 August 2019
clay
Pedro Martinez
ESP6
Pedro Martinez
#157ATP
1580ELO
1550Clay ELO
$335kYTD
$6.0MCAREER
29 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLLWW
Ruusuvuori E.
6-3 7-6
Martinez P.
Ruusuvuori E.
6772
Martinez P.
3650

Emil Ruusuvuori defeated Pedro Martinez 6-3 7-6 in the Augsburg CH quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Pedro Martinez came in ranked #157, leading the head-to-head 2–0. Emil Ruusuvuori claimed a first win over Pedro Martinez in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2021-11-08StockholmR32hardPedro Martinez6-4 3-6 7-6(4)
2021-02-08Australian OpenR64hardPedro Martinez1-6 6-3 6-2 7-6(5)

Serve vs return

This season
Ruusuvuori E.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Martinez P.

Martinez P.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Ruusuvuori E.

Serve advantage — Ruusuvuori E.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Ruusuvuori E.Martinez P.
—
Serve
5
—
Return
41

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ruusuvuori E.Martinez P.
1st serve in·Even
65%
68%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
64%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Dominant
4.7
1.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.9
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ruusuvuori E.Martinez P.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
72
66
Break points saved·Even
97
94
Break points won·Slight edge
48
41
Deciding sets·Slight edge
80
73
Tiebreaks·Even
86
82

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ruusuvuori E.Martinez P.
Freshness·
—
79

Martinez P.: 5 days rest · 2 matches, 58 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Hanfmann Y.[15]
Ruusuvuori E.
2-66-47-5
Semi-finals
Hanfmann Y.[15]
Mena F.
6-16-1
Ruusuvuori E.
Lenz J.
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Hanfmann Y.[15]
Vanneste J.
6-26-1
Mena F.
Altmaier D.
6-47-62
Lenz J.
Garcia Lopez G.[7]
7-643-67-5
Ruusuvuori E.
Martinez P.[6]
6-37-65
R16
Garcia Lopez G.[7]
Taberner C.
6-35-76-2
Lenz J.
Vilella Martinez M.[13]
6-16-2
Hanfmann Y.[15]
Bachinger M.[2]
6-756-26-1
Vanneste J.
Guinard M.
6-10-66-4
Altmaier D.
Baldi F.[3]
7-636-3
Mena F.
Hassan B.
4-66-16-0
Martinez P.[6]
Ofner S.[9]
6-46-1
Ruusuvuori E.
Laaksonen H.[1]
6-36-4
R32
Hassan B.
Rosol L.[5]
6-46-4
Guinard M.
Moraing M.[8]
6-45-71-2
Ruusuvuori E.
Zapata Miralles B.[14]
6-34-66-3
Taberner C.
Lestienne C.[12]
6-26-1
Bachinger M.[2]
Balaji N.
6-46-1
Hanfmann Y.[15]
Molcan A.
4-66-26-1
Vanneste J.
Clarke J.[11]
6-36-2
Baldi F.[3]
Blancaneaux G.
7-656-4
Altmaier D.
Miedler L.[16]
6-36-3
Mena F.
Guttau N.
6-47-5
Garcia Lopez G.[7]
Olivo R.
7-626-4
Vilella Martinez M.[13]
Heller P.
6-26-2
Lenz J.
Sundar Prashanth N.
7-56-1
Martinez P.[6]
Jahn J.
7-54-67-64
Ofner S.[9]
Zopp J.
6-46-2
Laaksonen H.[1]
Wessels L.
6-26-4
R64
Ruusuvuori E.
Sakamoto P.
6-26-1
Zopp J.
Metreveli A.
6-16-2
Heller P.
Roca Batalla O.
7-56-746-4
Wessels L.
Haerteis J.
7-667-5
Balaji N.
Strombachs R.
6-16-1
Molcan A.
Dima D.
6-26-746-4
Vanneste J.
Ignatik U.
6-47-5
Guinard M.
Brancaccio R.
6-36-4
Blancaneaux G.
Pavlasek A.
6-16-4
Altmaier D.
Mukund S.
4-66-17-66
Mena F.
Lemstra K.
6-46-2
Hassan B.
Wang T.
6-26-4
Olivo R.
Choinski J.
6-46-4
Taberner C.
Rinderknech A.
6-26-4
Lenz J.
Esteve Lobato E.
4-66-46-4
Jahn J.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-26-3