Ivan Gakhov vs Lorenzo Musetti — Manerbio CH Round of 64

Manerbio CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Ivan Gakhov
RUS
Ivan Gakhov
#388ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 August 2019
clay
Lorenzo Musetti
ITA
Lorenzo Musetti
#14ATP
1869ELO
1853Clay ELO
$961kYTD
$15MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWWLWWL
Gakhov I.
6-3 7-6
Musetti L.
Gakhov I.
6772
Musetti L.
3650

Ivan Gakhov defeated Lorenzo Musetti 6-3 7-6 in the Manerbio CH round of 64 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Lorenzo Musetti came in ranked #14.

Key context

  • Match story: Ivan Gakhov closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gakhov I.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Musetti L.

Musetti L.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Serve advantage — Musetti L.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Gakhov I.Musetti L.
—
Serve
34
—
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Gakhov I.Musetti L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
59%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
53%
Service points won·Even
62%
64%
Return points won·Even
37%
38%
Break points saved·Even
62%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.9
4.0
Double faults / match·Clear edge
3.4
2.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gakhov I.Musetti L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
34
89
Break points saved·Clear edge
82
98
Break points won·Dominant
9
82
Deciding sets·Dominant
59
99
Tiebreaks·Dominant
22
95

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Gaio F.[5]
Lorenzi P.[1]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Lorenzi P.[1]
Gabashvili T.
6-46-4
Gaio F.[5]
Coria F.[4]
1-66-46-2
Quarter-finals
Gaio F.[5]
Giustino L.[2]
4-2
Gabashvili T.
Arnaboldi A.[8]
7-624-66-3
Coria F.[4]
Piros Z.
6-46-4
Lorenzi P.[1]
Doumbia S.
1-67-56-4
R16
Gabashvili T.
King E.[14]
6-36-4
Giustino L.[2]
Kotov P.[13]
1-66-47-5
Gaio F.[5]
Serdarusic N.[11]
3-66-36-4
Coria F.[4]
Griekspoor S.
7-56-1
Piros Z.
Tseng C.
4-66-26-3
Arnaboldi A.[8]
Cerundolo F.
6-26-3
Doumbia S.
Pellegrino A.
5-76-36-4
Lorenzi P.[1]
Collarini A.[16]
6-46-3
R32
Arnaboldi A.[8]
Granollers G.
6-36-3
King E.[14]
Zeppieri G.
6-36-3
Lorenzi P.[1]
Torebko P.
2-66-16-4
Collarini A.[16]
Boluda Purkiss C.
6-06-3
Giustino L.[2]
Cuevas M.
7-633-66-3
Kotov P.[13]
Durasovic V.
0-66-26-3
Gaio F.[5]
Reboul F.
4-66-37-61
Piros Z.
Cacic N.
2-66-46-4
Cerundolo F.
Ferreira Silva F.[12]
6-43-66-1
Gabashvili T.
Coppejans K.[3]
5-76-36-3
Doumbia S.
Galovic V.[7]
6-16-2
Pellegrino A.
Oliveira G.[10]
6-16-4
Serdarusic N.[11]
Gakhov I.
6-36-3
Coria F.[4]
Etcheverry T.
7-644-66-4
Griekspoor S.
Tabilo A.[15]
6-36-2
Tseng C.
Safwat M.[9]
6-16-3
R64
Doumbia S.
Pavic A.
7-600-0
Piros Z.
Brkic T.
7-643-66-2
Durasovic V.
Speziali F.
6-17-64
Reboul F.
Barrientos N.
6-46-3
Etcheverry T.
Bega A.
6-36-2
Griekspoor S.
Bosio G.
6-37-61
Cerundolo F.
Rune H.
7-646-0
Zeppieri G.
Setkic A.
6-47-63
Gabashvili T.
Berrettini J.
6-06-756-3
Pellegrino A.
Gomez Herrera C.
6-24-67-67
Torebko P.
Cervantes Huegun I.
4-66-16-1
Cuevas M.
Bortolotti M.
7-646-1
Gakhov I.
Musetti L.
6-37-65
Tseng C.
Dalla Valle E.
7-636-4
Granollers G.
Van De Zandschulp B.
2-66-46-4