Damir Dzumhur vs Lukas Lacko — Aptos CH Round of 16

Aptos CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Damir Dzumhur
BIH1
Damir Dzumhur
#108ATP
1638ELO
1596Hard ELO
$528kYTD
$6.9MCAREER
34 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWLLWWLLW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 August 2019
hard
SVK
Lukas Lacko
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLLLWL
Dzumhur D.
6-7 6-3 7-6
Lacko L.
Dzumhur D.
6667112
Lacko L.
783691

Damir Dzumhur defeated Lukas Lacko 6-7 6-3 7-6 in the Aptos CH round of 16 on hard. The result followed the form book — Damir Dzumhur came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Damir Dzumhur extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2017-09-25ShenzhenR16hardDamir Dzumhur6-4 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Dzumhur D.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Lacko L.

Lacko L.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Dzumhur D.

Serve advantage — Dzumhur D.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Dzumhur D.Lacko L.
2
Serve
—
35
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Dzumhur D.Lacko L.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
64%
72%
2nd serve points won·Even
53%
49%
Service points won·Even
60%
63%
Return points won·Slight edge
41%
35%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
1.1
6.7
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.1
2.5

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 133). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Dzumhur D.Lacko L.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
70
26
Break points saved·Even
87
86
Break points won·Dominant
64
8
Deciding sets·Dominant
80
33
Tiebreaks·Dominant
70
27

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Dzumhur D.Lacko L.
Freshness·
76
—

Dzumhur D.: 1 day rest · 3 matches, 58 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Johnson S.[2]
Koepfer D.[4]
6-47-64
Semi-finals
Johnson S.[2]
Gerasimov E.[6]
6-26-1
Koepfer D.[4]
Escobedo E.
6-46-3
Quarter-finals
Koepfer D.[4]
Giron M.[7]
6-16-4
Johnson S.[2]
Soeda G.[10]
6-37-64
Escobedo E.
Dzumhur D.[1]
6-13-67-5
Gerasimov E.[6]
Daniel T.[3]
6-36-4
R16
Koepfer D.[4]
Sarkissian A.
6-37-62
Escobedo E.
Fratangelo B.[5]
7-626-757-612
Soeda G.[10]
Purcell M.
7-636-3
Johnson S.[2]
Broady L.
7-56-1
Dzumhur D.[1]
Lacko L.
6-766-37-69
Daniel T.[3]
Redlicki M.
3-67-57-63
Gerasimov E.[6]
Gomez E.[12]
6-37-5
Giron M.[7]
Gojo B.
3-67-626-4
R32
Purcell M.
Mmoh M.[8]
7-51-66-4
Lacko L.
Eubanks C.[13]
7-617-65
Redlicki M.
Janvier M.
6-36-4
Gerasimov E.[6]
Kokkinakis T.
7-626-4
Gomez E.[12]
Santillan A.
7-647-5
Escobedo E.
Krueger M.[11]
6-46-766-2
Koepfer D.[4]
Li Z.
6-36-4
Johnson S.[2]
Quiroz R.
6-16-2
Soeda G.[10]
Hoyt E.
7-637-5
Daniel T.[3]
Riffice S.
6-46-0
Gojo B.
Couacaud E.[9]
1-66-26-2
Dzumhur D.[1]
Smith K.
6-46-4
Sarkissian A.
Bemelmans R.[16]
6-726-16-2
Giron M.[7]
Redlicki M.
6-26-3
Broady L.
Ramanathan R.[14]
7-626-4
Fratangelo B.[5]
Sinner J.
7-666-3
R64
Quiroz R.
Harris A.
6-36-3
Sarkissian A.
Harrison R.
5-4
Sinner J.
Verbeek S.
3-67-636-2
Kokkinakis T.
Uzhylovsky V.
6-21-0
Janvier M.
Lee D.
6-44-66-4
Redlicki M.
Glasspool L.
7-656-4
Gojo B.
Arevalo M.
6-46-1
Purcell M.
Cressy M.
7-57-67
Hoyt E.
Aragone J.
6-46-2
Santillan A.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-36-4
Li Z.
Ward J.
6-46-2
Escobedo E.
Brooksby J.
6-26-2
Lacko L.
Young D.
6-46-2
Smith K.
Holt B.
6-46-3
Broady L.
Novikov D.
6-24-66-0
Riffice S.
Watanuki Y.
6-26-4