Renzo Olivo vs Jan Choinski — Augsburg CH Round of 64

Augsburg CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Renzo Olivo
ARG
Renzo Olivo
34 yrs · 178 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 5 August 2019
clay
Jan Choinski
GBR
Jan Choinski
#75ATP
1686ELO
1652Clay ELO
$204kYTD
$1.2MCAREER
30 yrs · 196 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWLWLWW
Olivo R.
6-4 6-4
Choinski J.
Olivo R.
662
Choinski J.
440

Renzo Olivo defeated Jan Choinski 6-4 6-4 in the Augsburg CH round of 64 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Renzo Olivo edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Olivo R.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Choinski J.

Choinski J.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Olivo R.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Olivo R.Choinski J.
1st serve in·Even
63%
65%
1st serve points won·Even
64%
68%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
46%
52%
Service points won·Even
58%
62%
Return points won·Even
41%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
56%
63%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.8
4.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.6
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Olivo R.Choinski J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
8
55
Break points saved·Dominant
33
90
Break points won·Slight edge
15
20
Deciding sets·Dominant
27
88
Tiebreaks·Even
41
41

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Olivo R.Choinski J.
Freshness·
—
55

Choinski J.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 113 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Hanfmann Y.[15]
Ruusuvuori E.
2-66-47-5
Semi-finals
Hanfmann Y.[15]
Mena F.
6-16-1
Ruusuvuori E.
Lenz J.
6-37-5
Quarter-finals
Hanfmann Y.[15]
Vanneste J.
6-26-1
Mena F.
Altmaier D.
6-47-62
Lenz J.
Garcia Lopez G.[7]
7-643-67-5
Ruusuvuori E.
Martinez P.[6]
6-37-65
R16
Garcia Lopez G.[7]
Taberner C.
6-35-76-2
Lenz J.
Vilella Martinez M.[13]
6-16-2
Hanfmann Y.[15]
Bachinger M.[2]
6-756-26-1
Vanneste J.
Guinard M.
6-10-66-4
Altmaier D.
Baldi F.[3]
7-636-3
Mena F.
Hassan B.
4-66-16-0
Martinez P.[6]
Ofner S.[9]
6-46-1
Ruusuvuori E.
Laaksonen H.[1]
6-36-4
R32
Hassan B.
Rosol L.[5]
6-46-4
Guinard M.
Moraing M.[8]
6-45-71-2
Ruusuvuori E.
Zapata Miralles B.[14]
6-34-66-3
Taberner C.
Lestienne C.[12]
6-26-1
Bachinger M.[2]
Balaji N.
6-46-1
Hanfmann Y.[15]
Molcan A.
4-66-26-1
Vanneste J.
Clarke J.[11]
6-36-2
Baldi F.[3]
Blancaneaux G.
7-656-4
Altmaier D.
Miedler L.[16]
6-36-3
Mena F.
Guttau N.
6-47-5
Garcia Lopez G.[7]
Olivo R.
7-626-4
Vilella Martinez M.[13]
Heller P.
6-26-2
Lenz J.
Sundar Prashanth N.
7-56-1
Martinez P.[6]
Jahn J.
7-54-67-64
Ofner S.[9]
Zopp J.
6-46-2
Laaksonen H.[1]
Wessels L.
6-26-4
R64
Ruusuvuori E.
Sakamoto P.
6-26-1
Zopp J.
Metreveli A.
6-16-2
Heller P.
Roca Batalla O.
7-56-746-4
Wessels L.
Haerteis J.
7-667-5
Balaji N.
Strombachs R.
6-16-1
Molcan A.
Dima D.
6-26-746-4
Vanneste J.
Ignatik U.
6-47-5
Guinard M.
Brancaccio R.
6-36-4
Blancaneaux G.
Pavlasek A.
6-16-4
Altmaier D.
Mukund S.
4-66-17-66
Mena F.
Lemstra K.
6-46-2
Hassan B.
Wang T.
6-26-4
Olivo R.
Choinski J.
6-46-4
Taberner C.
Rinderknech A.
6-26-4
Lenz J.
Esteve Lobato E.
4-66-46-4
Jahn J.
Barranco Cosano J.
6-26-3