Zsombor Piros vs Tomislav Brkic — Manerbio CH Round of 64

Manerbio CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Zsombor Piros
HUN
Zsombor Piros
#120ATP
1661ELO
1621Clay ELO
$145kYTD
$975kCAREER
26 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWWWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 5 August 2019
clay
BIH
Tomislav Brkic
36 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLLLLLWW
Piros Z.
7-6 3-6 6-2
Brkic T.
Piros Z.
77362
Brkic T.
64621

Zsombor Piros defeated Tomislav Brkic 7-6 3-6 6-2 in the Manerbio CH round of 64 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Zsombor Piros closed it out in three sets, 7–6 3–6 6–2.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Piros Z.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Brkic T.

Brkic T.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Piros Z.

Serve advantage — Piros Z.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Piros Z.Brkic T.
1st serve in·Even
59%
57%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
65%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
53%
47%
Service points won·Even
61%
57%
Return points won·Even
41%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
59%
Aces / match·Even
3.1
2.8
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 32). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Piros Z.Brkic T.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
57
13
Break points saved·Dominant
84
36
Break points won·Clear edge
32
15
Deciding sets·Dominant
85
29
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
48
56

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Piros Z.Brkic T.
Freshness·
54
—

Piros Z.: 2 days rest · 5 matches, 107 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Gaio F.[5]
Lorenzi P.[1]
6-36-1
Semi-finals
Lorenzi P.[1]
Gabashvili T.
6-46-4
Gaio F.[5]
Coria F.[4]
1-66-46-2
Quarter-finals
Gaio F.[5]
Giustino L.[2]
4-2
Gabashvili T.
Arnaboldi A.[8]
7-624-66-3
Coria F.[4]
Piros Z.
6-46-4
Lorenzi P.[1]
Doumbia S.
1-67-56-4
R16
Gabashvili T.
King E.[14]
6-36-4
Giustino L.[2]
Kotov P.[13]
1-66-47-5
Gaio F.[5]
Serdarusic N.[11]
3-66-36-4
Coria F.[4]
Griekspoor S.
7-56-1
Piros Z.
Tseng C.
4-66-26-3
Arnaboldi A.[8]
Cerundolo F.
6-26-3
Doumbia S.
Pellegrino A.
5-76-36-4
Lorenzi P.[1]
Collarini A.[16]
6-46-3
R32
Arnaboldi A.[8]
Granollers G.
6-36-3
King E.[14]
Zeppieri G.
6-36-3
Lorenzi P.[1]
Torebko P.
2-66-16-4
Collarini A.[16]
Boluda Purkiss C.
6-06-3
Giustino L.[2]
Cuevas M.
7-633-66-3
Kotov P.[13]
Durasovic V.
0-66-26-3
Gaio F.[5]
Reboul F.
4-66-37-61
Piros Z.
Cacic N.
2-66-46-4
Cerundolo F.
Ferreira Silva F.[12]
6-43-66-1
Gabashvili T.
Coppejans K.[3]
5-76-36-3
Doumbia S.
Galovic V.[7]
6-16-2
Pellegrino A.
Oliveira G.[10]
6-16-4
Serdarusic N.[11]
Gakhov I.
6-36-3
Coria F.[4]
Etcheverry T.
7-644-66-4
Griekspoor S.
Tabilo A.[15]
6-36-2
Tseng C.
Safwat M.[9]
6-16-3
R64
Doumbia S.
Pavic A.
7-600-0
Piros Z.
Brkic T.
7-643-66-2
Durasovic V.
Speziali F.
6-17-64
Reboul F.
Barrientos N.
6-46-3
Etcheverry T.
Bega A.
6-36-2
Griekspoor S.
Bosio G.
6-37-61
Cerundolo F.
Rune H.
7-646-0
Zeppieri G.
Setkic A.
6-47-63
Gabashvili T.
Berrettini J.
6-06-756-3
Pellegrino A.
Gomez Herrera C.
6-24-67-67
Torebko P.
Cervantes Huegun I.
4-66-16-1
Cuevas M.
Bortolotti M.
7-646-1
Gakhov I.
Musetti L.
6-37-65
Tseng C.
Dalla Valle E.
7-636-4
Granollers G.
Van De Zandschulp B.
2-66-46-4