Tomas Machac vs Jaroslav Pospisil — Liberec CH Round of 16

Liberec CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Tomas Machac
CZE
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1783Clay ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 July 2019
clay
CZE
Jaroslav Pospisil
45 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
Machac T.
6-4 6-4
Pospisil J.
Machac T.
662
Pospisil J.
440

Tomas Machac defeated Jaroslav Pospisil 6-4 6-4 in the Liberec CH round of 16 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Tomas Machac edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Machac T.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Pospisil J.

Pospisil J.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Serve advantage — Machac T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Machac T.Pospisil J.
13
Serve
—
46
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Machac T.Pospisil J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
62%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
70%
65%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
49%
Service points won·Slight edge
64%
58%
Return points won·Even
38%
39%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
57%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.0
2.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
2.5
4.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 31). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Machac T.Pospisil J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
5
Break points saved·Dominant
98
39
Break points won·Dominant
80
19
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
16
Tiebreaks·
97
—

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Milojevic N.[11]
Dutra Silva R.[15]
6-33-66-4
Semi-finals
Milojevic N.[11]
Nejedly P.
6-04-67-5
Dutra Silva R.[15]
Machac T.
6-36-0
Quarter-finals
Machac T.
Molcan A.
6-46-2
Dutra Silva R.[15]
Serdarusic N.
6-756-32-0
Nejedly P.
Domingues J.[7]
1-66-47-64
Milojevic N.[11]
Vesely J.[3]
7-621-66-2
R16
Nejedly P.
Gimeno Traver D.[16]
6-44-66-1
Domingues J.[7]
Marcora R.[10]
2-66-46-3
Vesely J.[3]
Kamke T.[14]
6-26-1
Milojevic N.[11]
Coria F.[8]
7-666-3
Serdarusic N.
Clarke J.[5]
4-66-06-1
Machac T.
Pospisil J.
6-46-4
Molcan A.
Guinard M.
4-66-26-2
Dutra Silva R.[15]
Baldi F.[4]
7-646-1
R32
Clarke J.[5]
Blancaneaux G.
7-666-3
Marcora R.[10]
Lehecka J.
6-757-56-4
Kamke T.[14]
Maamoun K.
6-26-2
Baldi F.[4]
Dima D.
6-36-726-1
Nejedly P.
Balazs A.[2]
6-44-67-62
Domingues J.[7]
Safranek V.
6-36-3
Vesely J.[3]
Piros Z.
6-36-1
Coria F.[8]
Vrbensky M.
6-46-2
Serdarusic N.
Reboul F.
6-32-67-65
Dutra Silva R.[15]
Nouza P.
6-36-2
Pospisil J.
Gaio F.[6]
4-66-37-5
Machac T.
Nedovyesov A.[12]
6-36-2
Molcan A.
Martin A.[1]
3-66-07-5
Gimeno Traver D.[16]
Wessels L.
6-43-66-3
Milojevic N.[11]
Taberner C.
5-76-37-62
Guinard M.
Trungelliti M.[13]
6-36-4
R64
Taberner C.
Forejtek J.
7-622-66-3
Dima D.
Mukund S.
6-43-66-0
Nouza P.
Moroni G.
4-5
Wessels L.
Denolly C.
6-41-66-3
Nejedly P.
Majsajdr L.
7-57-62
Lehecka J.
Ignatik U.
6-36-4
Piros Z.
Vilella Martinez M.
6-14-66-4
Blancaneaux G.
Heller P.
6-36-3
Serdarusic N.
Olivo R.
5-76-36-4
Pospisil J.
Wang T.
6-47-5
Guinard M.
Doumbia S.
7-646-2
Safranek V.
Kopriva V.
6-36-3
Maamoun K.
Pavlasek A.
6-36-3
Vrbensky M.
Collarini A.
6-43-66-1
Machac T.
Lenz J.
7-646-1
Molcan A.
Poljak D.
6-16-1