Tomas Machac vs Julian Lenz — Liberec CH Round of 64

Liberec CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Tomas Machac
CZE
Tomas Machac
#53ATP
1866ELO
1783Clay ELO
$832kYTD
$6.8MCAREER
25 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLWWLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 July 2019
clay
GER
Julian Lenz
33 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLWWWWWLLW
Machac T.
7-6 6-1
Lenz J.
Machac T.
7762
Lenz J.
6410

Tomas Machac defeated Julian Lenz 7-6 6-1 in the Liberec CH round of 64 on clay. The result followed the form book — Tomas Machac came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Tomas Machac extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Tomas Machac came through a tight passage before pulling clear — 7–6 6–1.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2020-09-28Roland GarrosQ1clayTomas Machac6-2 7-5
View full head-to-head →

Serve vs return

This season
Machac T.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Lenz J.

Lenz J.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Machac T.

Serve advantage — Machac T.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Machac T.Lenz J.
13
Serve
—
46
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Machac T.Lenz J.
1st serve in·Even
62%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
70%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
54%
47%
Service points won·Even
64%
61%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
56%
Aces / match·Even
5.0
5.1
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.5
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 142). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Machac T.Lenz J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
90
12
Break points saved·Dominant
98
40
Break points won·Dominant
80
13
Deciding sets·Dominant
94
39
Tiebreaks·Dominant
97
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-slowfavours grinders
SlowFast
Final
Milojevic N.[11]
Dutra Silva R.[15]
6-33-66-4
Semi-finals
Milojevic N.[11]
Nejedly P.
6-04-67-5
Dutra Silva R.[15]
Machac T.
6-36-0
Quarter-finals
Machac T.
Molcan A.
6-46-2
Dutra Silva R.[15]
Serdarusic N.
6-756-32-0
Nejedly P.
Domingues J.[7]
1-66-47-64
Milojevic N.[11]
Vesely J.[3]
7-621-66-2
R16
Nejedly P.
Gimeno Traver D.[16]
6-44-66-1
Domingues J.[7]
Marcora R.[10]
2-66-46-3
Vesely J.[3]
Kamke T.[14]
6-26-1
Milojevic N.[11]
Coria F.[8]
7-666-3
Serdarusic N.
Clarke J.[5]
4-66-06-1
Machac T.
Pospisil J.
6-46-4
Molcan A.
Guinard M.
4-66-26-2
Dutra Silva R.[15]
Baldi F.[4]
7-646-1
R32
Clarke J.[5]
Blancaneaux G.
7-666-3
Marcora R.[10]
Lehecka J.
6-757-56-4
Kamke T.[14]
Maamoun K.
6-26-2
Baldi F.[4]
Dima D.
6-36-726-1
Nejedly P.
Balazs A.[2]
6-44-67-62
Domingues J.[7]
Safranek V.
6-36-3
Vesely J.[3]
Piros Z.
6-36-1
Coria F.[8]
Vrbensky M.
6-46-2
Serdarusic N.
Reboul F.
6-32-67-65
Dutra Silva R.[15]
Nouza P.
6-36-2
Pospisil J.
Gaio F.[6]
4-66-37-5
Machac T.
Nedovyesov A.[12]
6-36-2
Molcan A.
Martin A.[1]
3-66-07-5
Gimeno Traver D.[16]
Wessels L.
6-43-66-3
Milojevic N.[11]
Taberner C.
5-76-37-62
Guinard M.
Trungelliti M.[13]
6-36-4
R64
Taberner C.
Forejtek J.
7-622-66-3
Dima D.
Mukund S.
6-43-66-0
Nouza P.
Moroni G.
4-5
Wessels L.
Denolly C.
6-41-66-3
Nejedly P.
Majsajdr L.
7-57-62
Lehecka J.
Ignatik U.
6-36-4
Piros Z.
Vilella Martinez M.
6-14-66-4
Blancaneaux G.
Heller P.
6-36-3
Serdarusic N.
Olivo R.
5-76-36-4
Pospisil J.
Wang T.
6-47-5
Guinard M.
Doumbia S.
7-646-2
Safranek V.
Kopriva V.
6-36-3
Maamoun K.
Pavlasek A.
6-36-3
Vrbensky M.
Collarini A.
6-43-66-1
Machac T.
Lenz J.
7-646-1
Molcan A.
Poljak D.
6-16-1