Jannik Sinner vs Duck Hee Lee — Lexington CH Quarter-final

Lexington CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Jannik Sinner
ITA3
Jannik Sinner
#1ATP
2320ELO
2263Hard ELO
$6.9MYTD
$65MCAREER
24 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWLWW
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 29 July 2019
hard
KOR5
Duck Hee Lee
28 yrs · 175 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLWL
Sinner J.
4-6 6-3 6-1
Lee D.
Sinner J.
4662
Lee D.
6311

Jannik Sinner defeated Duck Hee Lee 4-6 6-3 6-1 in the Lexington CH quarter-final on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Sinner J.serving90% hold

wins 70% of points on serve vs Lee D.

Lee D.serving61% hold

wins 54% of points on serve vs Sinner J.

Serve advantage — Sinner J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Sinner J.Lee D.
100
Serve
—
100
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Sinner J.Lee D.
1st serve in·Even
62%
59%
1st serve points won·Clear edge
79%
63%
2nd serve points won·Clear edge
58%
46%
Service points won·Clear edge
71%
56%
Return points won·Even
41%
40%
Break points saved·Clear edge
74%
54%
Aces / match·Dominant
7.4
2.6
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.6
4.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 90). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sinner J.Lee D.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
100
6
Break points saved·Dominant
100
13
Break points won·Dominant
100
30
Deciding sets·Dominant
100
18
Tiebreaks·Dominant
100
60

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Sinner J.Lee D.
Freshness·
51
—

Sinner J.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 109 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast
Final
Sinner J.[3]
Bolt A.[2]
6-43-66-4
Semi-finals
Sinner J.[3]
Aragone J.[13]
6-26-4
Bolt A.[2]
Glasspool L.
6-36-2
Quarter-finals
Aragone J.[13]
Santillan A.[7]
7-647-63
Bolt A.[2]
Ritschard A.
6-46-726-4
Glasspool L.
Broady L.[14]
6-46-3
Sinner J.[3]
Lee D.[5]
4-66-36-1
R16
Ritschard A.
Banes M.[9]
6-46-2
Lee D.[5]
Karlovskiy E.[12]
4-66-26-4
Bolt A.[2]
Smith R.
3-66-36-4
Broady L.[14]
Hidalgo D.
4-66-46-3
Glasspool L.
Verbeek S.
6-46-3
Sinner J.[3]
Cressy M.[16]
6-46-7106-1
Santillan A.[7]
Gojo B.
7-634-66-2
Aragone J.[13]
Sigouin B.
6-36-2
R32
Banes M.[9]
Mcnally J.
7-653-66-1
Santillan A.[7]
Kirkov V.
6-46-3
Karlovskiy E.[12]
Sarmiento R.
7-656-3
Broady L.[14]
Bangoura S.
1-67-646-2
Hidalgo D.
Harris A.[4]
6-47-68
Lee D.[5]
Moreno De Alboran N.
6-26-3
Bolt A.[2]
Draxl L.
1-67-56-2
Smith R.
Altamirano C.[15]
6-46-756-2
Ritschard A.
Lebedev A.
4-66-26-3
Verbeek S.
Wallart E.
6-26-3
Glasspool L.
Uchida K.[8]
6-46-3
Sinner J.[3]
Zakharov A.
4-66-16-3
Gojo B.
Vukic A.[11]
6-46-3
Aragone J.[13]
Korda S.
7-666-4
Sigouin B.
Polansky P.[1]
6-46-4
Cressy M.[16]
Hoyt E.
6-46-756-1
R64
Glasspool L.
Kodat T.
6-16-4
Sarmiento R.
Redlicki M.
7-636-1
Smith R.
Leshem E.
7-667-63
Wallart E.
Crawford O.
6-46-3
Ritschard A.
Krainik P.
6-16-1
Kirkov V.
Shane R.
6-31-66-3
Draxl L.
Smith K.
6-47-62
Mcnally J.
Sinclair C.
7-633-66-1
Hidalgo D.
Clark E.
6-36-2
Bangoura S.
Kirchheimer S.
4-66-16-4
Moreno De Alboran N.
Van Rijthoven T.
6-27-69
Hoyt E.
Rybakov A.
6-26-736-2
Gojo B.
Gabashvili T.
4-66-36-1
Sigouin B.
Hohmann R.
6-16-4
Korda S.
Pervolarakis M.
6-36-2
Zakharov A.
Garanganga T.
6-16-2
Glasspool L.
Kodat T.
6-16-4