Thomas Fancutt vs Evan Zhu — Chengdu CH Round of 64

Chengdu CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Thomas Fancutt
AUS
Thomas Fancutt
#838ATP
31 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLLWLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 July 2019
hard
USA
Evan Zhu
#692ATP
27 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWWWLL
Fancutt T.
6-3 6-3
Zhu E.
Fancutt T.
662
Zhu E.
330

Thomas Fancutt defeated Evan Zhu 6-3 6-3 in the Chengdu CH round of 64 on hard.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Fancutt T.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Zhu E.

Zhu E.serving83% hold

wins 65% of points on serve vs Fancutt T.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Fancutt T.Zhu E.
1st serve in·Even
58%
61%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
73%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
50%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
34%
37%
Break points saved·Even
61%
58%
Aces / match·Dominant
8.5
4.3
Double faults / match·Clear edge
4.3
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (62 vs 154). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Fancutt T.Zhu E.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
15
10
Break points saved·Dominant
62
31
Break points won·Clear edge
17
4
Deciding sets·Dominant
32
60
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
4
9

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Fancutt T.Zhu E.
Freshness·
100
—

Fancutt T.: 17 days rest. Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Chung H.[2]
Sugita Y.[6]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Sugita Y.[6]
Bai Y.[16]
6-16-3
Chung H.[2]
Ito T.[3]
6-27-64
Quarter-finals
Chung H.[2]
Nam J.[10]
7-621-66-3
Ito T.[3]
Sekiguchi S.
6-26-1
Bai Y.[16]
Zhang Z.[11]
2-67-616-4
Sugita Y.[6]
Duckworth J.[1]
3-67-656-4
R16
Sugita Y.[6]
Heliovaara H.
7-620-0
Zhang Z.[11]
Myneni S.[8]
6-747-57-64
Chung H.[2]
Wu D.[14]
7-646-766-3
Bai Y.[16]
Zhang Z.[4]
7-636-766-3
Nam J.[10]
Kelly D.
7-616-3
Ito T.[3]
Romios M.
6-26-1
Sekiguchi S.
Oliveira G.[7]
6-43-66-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Fancutt T.
6-26-2
R32
Romios M.
Klein B.[13]
5-77-654-2
Myneni S.[8]
Matsui T.
6-30-0
Oliveira G.[7]
Kadhe A.
7-646-3
Duckworth J.[1]
Hua R.
6-757-646-3
Wu D.[14]
Wang C.
6-36-3
Zhang Z.[11]
Bourchier H.
7-652-67-5
Chung H.[2]
Takeuchi K.
6-36-2
Nam J.[10]
Gong M.
7-626-1
Kelly D.
Chung Y.[5]
6-34-66-2
Ito T.[3]
Ochi M.
6-46-3
Sekiguchi S.
Yang T.[12]
6-46-4
Bai Y.[16]
Takahashi Y.
6-46-2
Zhang Z.[4]
Catarina L.
6-34-66-2
Sugita Y.[6]
Cui J.
6-16-4
Heliovaara H.
Wu T.[9]
3-67-656-2
Fancutt T.
Xia Z.[15]
7-616-4
R64
Kelly D.
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
7-627-64
Ochi M.
Wang C.
3-66-04-0
Hua R.
Orlov V.
6-46-3
Matsui T.
Sureshkumar M.
7-656-4
Bourchier H.
Lock B.
6-26-2
Takeuchi K.
Liu H.
6-46-766-3
Wang C.
Rochette L.
7-56-2
Gong M.
Song M.
3-67-697-62
Romios M.
Rawat S.
7-676-4
Sekiguchi S.
Zheng W.
7-56-1
Kadhe A.
Ellis B.
1-66-37-64
Takahashi Y.
Okamura I.
6-16-2
Cui J.
Ayeni O.
6-26-1
Fancutt T.
Zhu E.
6-36-3
Heliovaara H.
Lock C.
6-36-2