Martin Cuevas vs Johannes Haerteis — Sopot CH Round of 64

Sopot CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
URU
Martin Cuevas
34 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLLLWLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 July 2019
clay
GER
Johannes Haerteis
30 yrs · 196 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLWWLL
Cuevas M.
7-6 6-4
Haerteis J.
Cuevas M.
7762
Haerteis J.
6540

Martin Cuevas defeated Johannes Haerteis 7-6 6-4 in the Sopot CH round of 64 on clay. The result followed the form book — Martin Cuevas came in defending last year's round of 32.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Cuevas M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Haerteis J.

Haerteis J.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Cuevas M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Cuevas M.Haerteis J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
54%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
46%
Service points won·Even
59%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
37%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
5.3
4.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
4.5
4.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (84 vs 117). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Cuevas M.Haerteis J.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
14
38
Break points saved·Dominant
35
71
Break points won·Slight edge
22
12
Deciding sets·Dominant
20
76
Tiebreaks·Dominant
71
25

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Travaglia S.[1]
Horansky F.[10]
6-42-66-2
Semi-finals
Horansky F.[10]
Karatsev A.
5-77-57-67
Travaglia S.[1]
Lamasine T.[14]
6-17-5
Quarter-finals
Horansky F.[10]
Choinski J.[16]
6-16-0
Karatsev A.
Lorenzi P.[3]
4-66-37-64
Lamasine T.[14]
Vatutin A.[11]
3-67-56-2
Travaglia S.[1]
Safwat M.[12]
6-46-4
R16
Safwat M.[12]
Martinez P.[7]
6-36-4
Travaglia S.[1]
Elias G.
6-46-2
Choinski J.[16]
Jahn J.
6-36-776-4
Horansky F.[10]
Metreveli A.
6-36-1
Lorenzi P.[3]
Zopp J.[15]
2-66-36-4
Karatsev A.
Oconnell C.
6-26-1
Vatutin A.[11]
Coppejans K.[6]
6-46-2
Lamasine T.[14]
Ymer M.[4]
2-66-46-1
R32
Safwat M.[12]
Ornago F.
7-626-2
Elias G.
Kolar Z.[13]
6-43-66-4
Martinez P.[7]
Mena F.
7-616-0
Jahn J.
Majchrzak K.[2]
6-756-17-5
Choinski J.[16]
Brkic T.
3-66-46-3
Horansky F.[10]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-06-3
Metreveli A.
Giannessi A.[8]
4-66-36-4
Lorenzi P.[3]
Cuevas M.
6-36-1
Zopp J.[15]
Nedelko I.
6-26-1
Oconnell C.
Robredo T.[9]
6-47-64
Karatsev A.
Giustino L.[5]
7-636-3
Coppejans K.[6]
Zhurbin A.
6-36-2
Vatutin A.[11]
Tseng C.
6-36-3
Lamasine T.[14]
Pellegrino A.
5-76-46-4
Ymer M.[4]
Gakhov I.
6-26-3
Travaglia S.[1]
Michalski D.
6-16-1
R64
Zhurbin A.
Bonadio R.
7-617-62
Mena F.
Dembek M.
6-06-3
Cuevas M.
Haerteis J.
7-656-4
Brkic T.
Cias P.
7-56-4
Jahn J.
Sakamoto P.
6-36-3
Barranco Cosano J.
Pavic A.
6-47-5
Metreveli A.
Zuk K.
6-36-1
Nedelko I.
Tiurnev E.
6-36-2
Oconnell C.
Dalla Valle E.
6-06-2
Karatsev A.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-56-4
Tseng C.
Durasovic V.
6-36-4
Pellegrino A.
Bortolotti M.
6-36-1
Gakhov I.
Berrettini J.
6-37-5
Ornago F.
Avidzba A.
6-33-67-5
Elias G.
Golubev A.
6-16-1
Michalski D.
Przysiezny M.
6-27-5