Hyeon Chung vs Tatsuma Ito — Chengdu CH Semi-final

Chengdu CH · CHALLENGER · Semi-final
KOR2
Hyeon Chung
#573ATP
1488ELO
1459Hard ELO
30 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLWLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 July 2019
hard
JPN3
Tatsuma Ito
38 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLWLW
Chung H.
6-2 7-6
Ito T.
Chung H.
6772
Ito T.
2640

Hyeon Chung defeated Tatsuma Ito 6-2 7-6 in the Chengdu CH semi-final on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Tatsuma Ito came in defending last year's quarter-final, but Hyeon Chung had been the form player, winning 5 of their last 8 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Hyeon Chung closed it out in two sets, 6–2 7–6.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Chung H.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Ito T.

Ito T.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Chung H.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Chung H.Ito T.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
68%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
46%
49%
Service points won·Even
59%
61%
Return points won·Even
41%
38%
Break points saved·Even
55%
58%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.8
3.8
Double faults / match·Dominant
4.9
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (88 vs 130). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Chung H.Ito T.
Clutch Rating·Even
24
24
Break points saved·Slight edge
69
61
Break points won·Dominant
43
9
Deciding sets·Clear edge
21
43
Tiebreaks·Dominant
15
48

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Fastbig serves, short points
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Chung H.[2]
Sugita Y.[6]
6-46-3
Semi-finals
Sugita Y.[6]
Bai Y.[16]
6-16-3
Chung H.[2]
Ito T.[3]
6-27-64
Quarter-finals
Chung H.[2]
Nam J.[10]
7-621-66-3
Ito T.[3]
Sekiguchi S.
6-26-1
Bai Y.[16]
Zhang Z.[11]
2-67-616-4
Sugita Y.[6]
Duckworth J.[1]
3-67-656-4
R16
Sugita Y.[6]
Heliovaara H.
7-620-0
Zhang Z.[11]
Myneni S.[8]
6-747-57-64
Chung H.[2]
Wu D.[14]
7-646-766-3
Bai Y.[16]
Zhang Z.[4]
7-636-766-3
Nam J.[10]
Kelly D.
7-616-3
Ito T.[3]
Romios M.
6-26-1
Sekiguchi S.
Oliveira G.[7]
6-43-66-4
Duckworth J.[1]
Fancutt T.
6-26-2
R32
Romios M.
Klein B.[13]
5-77-654-2
Myneni S.[8]
Matsui T.
6-30-0
Oliveira G.[7]
Kadhe A.
7-646-3
Duckworth J.[1]
Hua R.
6-757-646-3
Wu D.[14]
Wang C.
6-36-3
Zhang Z.[11]
Bourchier H.
7-652-67-5
Chung H.[2]
Takeuchi K.
6-36-2
Nam J.[10]
Gong M.
7-626-1
Kelly D.
Chung Y.[5]
6-34-66-2
Ito T.[3]
Ochi M.
6-46-3
Sekiguchi S.
Yang T.[12]
6-46-4
Bai Y.[16]
Takahashi Y.
6-46-2
Zhang Z.[4]
Catarina L.
6-34-66-2
Sugita Y.[6]
Cui J.
6-16-4
Heliovaara H.
Wu T.[9]
3-67-656-2
Fancutt T.
Xia Z.[15]
7-616-4
R64
Kelly D.
Trongcharoenchaikul W.
7-627-64
Ochi M.
Wang C.
3-66-04-0
Hua R.
Orlov V.
6-46-3
Matsui T.
Sureshkumar M.
7-656-4
Bourchier H.
Lock B.
6-26-2
Takeuchi K.
Liu H.
6-46-766-3
Wang C.
Rochette L.
7-56-2
Gong M.
Song M.
3-67-697-62
Romios M.
Rawat S.
7-676-4
Sekiguchi S.
Zheng W.
7-56-1
Kadhe A.
Ellis B.
1-66-37-64
Takahashi Y.
Okamura I.
6-16-2
Cui J.
Ayeni O.
6-26-1
Fancutt T.
Zhu E.
6-36-3
Heliovaara H.
Lock C.
6-36-2