Ivan Gakhov vs Jacopo Berrettini — Sopot CH Round of 64

Sopot CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Ivan Gakhov
RUS
Ivan Gakhov
#388ATP
1430ELO
1384Clay ELO
29 yrs · 191 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 29 July 2019
clay
ITA
Jacopo Berrettini
#546ATP
1325ELO
1336Clay ELO
27 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLWLLLL
Gakhov I.
6-3 7-5
Berrettini J.
Gakhov I.
672
Berrettini J.
350

Ivan Gakhov defeated Jacopo Berrettini 6-3 7-5 in the Sopot CH round of 64 on clay.

Key context

  • Match story: Ivan Gakhov closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–5.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Gakhov I.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Berrettini J.

Berrettini J.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Gakhov I.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Gakhov I.Berrettini J.
1st serve in·Even
59%
60%
1st serve points won·Even
70%
66%
2nd serve points won·Even
49%
47%
Service points won·Even
62%
58%
Return points won·Even
37%
40%
Break points saved·Slight edge
62%
54%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.9
2.5
Double faults / match·Even
3.4
3.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 140). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Gakhov I.Berrettini J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
34
2
Break points saved·Dominant
82
23
Break points won·Slight edge
9
17
Deciding sets·Dominant
59
21
Tiebreaks·Clear edge
22
35

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Travaglia S.[1]
Horansky F.[10]
6-42-66-2
Semi-finals
Horansky F.[10]
Karatsev A.
5-77-57-67
Travaglia S.[1]
Lamasine T.[14]
6-17-5
Quarter-finals
Horansky F.[10]
Choinski J.[16]
6-16-0
Karatsev A.
Lorenzi P.[3]
4-66-37-64
Lamasine T.[14]
Vatutin A.[11]
3-67-56-2
Travaglia S.[1]
Safwat M.[12]
6-46-4
R16
Safwat M.[12]
Martinez P.[7]
6-36-4
Travaglia S.[1]
Elias G.
6-46-2
Choinski J.[16]
Jahn J.
6-36-776-4
Horansky F.[10]
Metreveli A.
6-36-1
Lorenzi P.[3]
Zopp J.[15]
2-66-36-4
Karatsev A.
Oconnell C.
6-26-1
Vatutin A.[11]
Coppejans K.[6]
6-46-2
Lamasine T.[14]
Ymer M.[4]
2-66-46-1
R32
Safwat M.[12]
Ornago F.
7-626-2
Elias G.
Kolar Z.[13]
6-43-66-4
Martinez P.[7]
Mena F.
7-616-0
Jahn J.
Majchrzak K.[2]
6-756-17-5
Choinski J.[16]
Brkic T.
3-66-46-3
Horansky F.[10]
Barranco Cosano J.
6-06-3
Metreveli A.
Giannessi A.[8]
4-66-36-4
Lorenzi P.[3]
Cuevas M.
6-36-1
Zopp J.[15]
Nedelko I.
6-26-1
Oconnell C.
Robredo T.[9]
6-47-64
Karatsev A.
Giustino L.[5]
7-636-3
Coppejans K.[6]
Zhurbin A.
6-36-2
Vatutin A.[11]
Tseng C.
6-36-3
Lamasine T.[14]
Pellegrino A.
5-76-46-4
Ymer M.[4]
Gakhov I.
6-26-3
Travaglia S.[1]
Michalski D.
6-16-1
R64
Zhurbin A.
Bonadio R.
7-617-62
Mena F.
Dembek M.
6-06-3
Cuevas M.
Haerteis J.
7-656-4
Brkic T.
Cias P.
7-56-4
Jahn J.
Sakamoto P.
6-36-3
Barranco Cosano J.
Pavic A.
6-47-5
Metreveli A.
Zuk K.
6-36-1
Nedelko I.
Tiurnev E.
6-36-2
Oconnell C.
Dalla Valle E.
6-06-2
Karatsev A.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-56-4
Tseng C.
Durasovic V.
6-36-4
Pellegrino A.
Bortolotti M.
6-36-1
Gakhov I.
Berrettini J.
6-37-5
Ornago F.
Avidzba A.
6-33-67-5
Elias G.
Golubev A.
6-16-1
Michalski D.
Przysiezny M.
6-27-5