Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Miljan Zekic — Tampere CH Round of 64

Tampere CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED
Botic Van De Zandschulp
#55ATP
1743ELO
1690Clay ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 July 2019
clay
SRB
Miljan Zekic
38 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLWLWWW
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-4 6-2
Zekic M.
Van De Zandschulp B.
662
Zekic M.
420

Botic Van De Zandschulp defeated Miljan Zekic 6-4 6-2 in the Tampere CH round of 64 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.serving74% hold

wins 60% of points on serve vs Zekic M.

Zekic M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Serve advantage — Van De Zandschulp B.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Van De Zandschulp B.Zekic M.
33
Serve
—
74
Return
—

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Van De Zandschulp B.Zekic M.
1st serve in·Even
62%
61%
1st serve points won·Even
71%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
46%
Service points won·Even
62%
60%
Return points won·Even
38%
38%
Break points saved·Even
60%
56%
Aces / match·Clear edge
5.6
3.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
3.9
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 121). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Van De Zandschulp B.Zekic M.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
77
22
Break points saved·Dominant
98
36
Break points won·Dominant
68
9
Deciding sets·Slight edge
79
68
Tiebreaks·Dominant
81
36

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Van De Zandschulp B.Zekic M.
Freshness·
91
—

Van De Zandschulp B.: 12 days rest · 2 matches (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Ymer M.[3]
Griekspoor T.[9]
6-35-76-3
Semi-finals
Griekspoor T.[9]
Sousa P.[1]
7-610-0
Ymer M.[3]
Rola B.[5]
6-747-57-5
Quarter-finals
Sousa P.[1]
Coria F.[7]
6-46-2
Rola B.[5]
Ymer E.[2]
6-17-63
Griekspoor T.[9]
Coppejans K.[4]
6-26-4
Ymer M.[3]
Krstin P.[11]
2-66-17-65
R16
Krstin P.[11]
Clezar G.
7-636-1
Coria F.[7]
Doumbia S.
6-26-3
Ymer M.[3]
Niklas Salminen P.
6-44-66-3
Ymer E.[2]
Ruusuvuori E.[16]
6-24-66-3
Rola B.[5]
Elias G.
6-16-4
Griekspoor T.[9]
Horansky F.[8]
6-41-66-3
Coppejans K.[4]
Vanneste J.
6-766-16-0
Sousa P.[1]
Nedelko I.
6-16-0
R32
Coppejans K.[4]
Hassan B.
6-36-3
Coria F.[7]
Olivo R.
7-56-746-3
Rola B.[5]
Kuzmanov D.
6-22-1
Ymer E.[2]
Vasa E.
6-16-0
Niklas Salminen P.
Viola M.[13]
1-66-46-1
Horansky F.[8]
Guinard M.
6-776-27-64
Clezar G.
Gaio F.[6]
6-37-5
Ruusuvuori E.[16]
Durasovic V.
6-15-76-4
Ymer M.[3]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-42-66-2
Krstin P.[11]
Oconnell C.
6-41-66-3
Griekspoor T.[9]
Karatsev A.
3-66-46-3
Vanneste J.
Oliveira G.[14]
6-37-65
Doumbia S.
Kolar Z.[12]
6-14-66-4
Nedelko I.
Zopp J.[15]
6-26-726-2
Sousa P.[1]
Zhurbin A.
6-33-66-1
Elias G.
Quiroz R.[10]
6-786-36-3
R64
Elias G.
Cuevas M.
7-56-0
Kuzmanov D.
Pellegrino A.
4-66-37-5
Niklas Salminen P.
Bega A.
4-67-657-64
Oconnell C.
Sultanov K.
7-56-4
Clezar G.
Piros Z.
6-36-4
Doumbia S.
Patael B.
6-30-0
Vanneste J.
Reboul F.
7-626-2
Olivo R.
Gakhov I.
7-56-756-4
Zhurbin A.
Heyman C.
6-46-2
Hassan B.
Virtanen P.
7-636-1
Nedelko I.
Heliovaara H.
6-43-66-1
Vasa E.
Dima D.
6-46-4
Durasovic V.
Rikkonen R.
2-67-56-0
Karatsev A.
Vavassori A.
6-26-2
Guinard M.
Eriksson M.
6-46-1
Van De Zandschulp B.
Zekic M.
6-46-2