Mikael Ymer vs Botic Van De Zandschulp — Tampere CH Round of 32

Tampere CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 32
SWE3
Mikael Ymer
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 July 2019
clay
Botic Van De Zandschulp
NED
Botic Van De Zandschulp
#55ATP
1743ELO
1690Clay ELO
$690kYTD
$6.6MCAREER
30 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWLWLLLLLW
Ymer M.
6-4 2-6 6-2
Van De Zandschulp B.
Ymer M.
6262
Van De Zandschulp B.
4621

Mikael Ymer defeated Botic Van De Zandschulp 6-4 2-6 6-2 in the Tampere CH round of 32 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Botic Van De Zandschulp came in leading the head-to-head 2–1, but Mikael Ymer had been the form player, winning 2 of their last 5 on clay. Mikael Ymer narrowed the head-to-head to 2–2.

Key context

  • Match story: Mikael Ymer closed it out in three sets, 6–4 2–6 6–2.

Head to head

1–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2025-07-14BastadR32clayBotic Van De Zandschulp6-4 6-1
2023-06-26EastbourneR32grassMikael Ymer3-6 6-4 6-2
2023-02-27DubaiR16hardBotic Van De Zandschulp3-6 6-3 6-3

Serve vs return

This season
Ymer M.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Van De Zandschulp B.

Van De Zandschulp B.serving70% hold

wins 58% of points on serve vs Ymer M.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Ymer M.Van De Zandschulp B.
—
Serve
26
—
Return
74

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ymer M.Van De Zandschulp B.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
47%
Service points won·Even
60%
62%
Return points won·Even
40%
38%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.5
5.6
Double faults / match·Slight edge
3.2
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ymer M.Van De Zandschulp B.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
71
77
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
98
Break points won·Even
71
68
Deciding sets·Clear edge
94
79
Tiebreaks·Dominant
29
80

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ymer M.Van De Zandschulp B.
Freshness·
—
95

Van De Zandschulp B.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Ymer M.[3]
Griekspoor T.[9]
6-35-76-3
Semi-finals
Griekspoor T.[9]
Sousa P.[1]
7-610-0
Ymer M.[3]
Rola B.[5]
6-747-57-5
Quarter-finals
Sousa P.[1]
Coria F.[7]
6-46-2
Rola B.[5]
Ymer E.[2]
6-17-63
Griekspoor T.[9]
Coppejans K.[4]
6-26-4
Ymer M.[3]
Krstin P.[11]
2-66-17-65
R16
Krstin P.[11]
Clezar G.
7-636-1
Coria F.[7]
Doumbia S.
6-26-3
Ymer M.[3]
Niklas Salminen P.
6-44-66-3
Ymer E.[2]
Ruusuvuori E.[16]
6-24-66-3
Rola B.[5]
Elias G.
6-16-4
Griekspoor T.[9]
Horansky F.[8]
6-41-66-3
Coppejans K.[4]
Vanneste J.
6-766-16-0
Sousa P.[1]
Nedelko I.
6-16-0
R32
Coppejans K.[4]
Hassan B.
6-36-3
Coria F.[7]
Olivo R.
7-56-746-3
Rola B.[5]
Kuzmanov D.
6-22-1
Ymer E.[2]
Vasa E.
6-16-0
Niklas Salminen P.
Viola M.[13]
1-66-46-1
Horansky F.[8]
Guinard M.
6-776-27-64
Clezar G.
Gaio F.[6]
6-37-5
Ruusuvuori E.[16]
Durasovic V.
6-15-76-4
Ymer M.[3]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-42-66-2
Krstin P.[11]
Oconnell C.
6-41-66-3
Griekspoor T.[9]
Karatsev A.
3-66-46-3
Vanneste J.
Oliveira G.[14]
6-37-65
Doumbia S.
Kolar Z.[12]
6-14-66-4
Nedelko I.
Zopp J.[15]
6-26-726-2
Sousa P.[1]
Zhurbin A.
6-33-66-1
Elias G.
Quiroz R.[10]
6-786-36-3
R64
Elias G.
Cuevas M.
7-56-0
Kuzmanov D.
Pellegrino A.
4-66-37-5
Niklas Salminen P.
Bega A.
4-67-657-64
Oconnell C.
Sultanov K.
7-56-4
Clezar G.
Piros Z.
6-36-4
Doumbia S.
Patael B.
6-30-0
Vanneste J.
Reboul F.
7-626-2
Olivo R.
Gakhov I.
7-56-756-4
Zhurbin A.
Heyman C.
6-46-2
Hassan B.
Virtanen P.
7-636-1
Nedelko I.
Heliovaara H.
6-43-66-1
Vasa E.
Dima D.
6-46-4
Durasovic V.
Rikkonen R.
2-67-56-0
Karatsev A.
Vavassori A.
6-26-2
Guinard M.
Eriksson M.
6-46-1
Van De Zandschulp B.
Zekic M.
6-46-2