Carlos Taberner vs Lukas Rosol — Prague CH Quarter-final

Prague CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
Carlos Taberner
ESP
Carlos Taberner
#197ATP
1610ELO
1605Clay ELO
$102kYTD
$1.6MCAREER
28 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWLWWLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 July 2019
clay
CZE2
Lukas Rosol
40 yrs · 193 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLLLLLLLL
Taberner C.
6-2 6-2
Rosol L.
Taberner C.
662
Rosol L.
220

Carlos Taberner defeated Lukas Rosol 6-2 6-2 in the Prague CH quarter-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Lukas Rosol came in defending the title, but Carlos Taberner had been the form player, winning 3 of their last 7 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Taberner C.serving72% hold

wins 59% of points on serve vs Rosol L.

Rosol L.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Taberner C.

Serve advantage — Taberner C.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Taberner C.Rosol L.
1st serve in·Even
63%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
71%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
49%
Service points won·Even
59%
62%
Return points won·Slight edge
43%
36%
Break points saved·Even
58%
60%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.6
4.6
Double faults / match·Even
3.5
3.3

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Taberner C.Rosol L.
Clutch Rating·Even
53
51
Break points saved·Clear edge
74
89
Break points won·Dominant
59
3
Deciding sets·Even
75
77
Tiebreaks·Dominant
22
73

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Vilella Martinez M.
Tseng C.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Tseng C.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-16-4
Vilella Martinez M.
Taberner C.
7-56-2
Quarter-finals
Vilella Martinez M.
Giustino L.[3]
6-07-67
Ferreira Silva F.
Klein L.
3-66-16-0
Tseng C.
Zapata Miralles B.[11]
5-76-46-3
Taberner C.
Rosol L.[2]
6-26-2
R16
Rosol L.[2]
Safwat M.[13]
4-66-36-2
Taberner C.
Milojevic N.[5]
6-46-3
Giustino L.[3]
Safranek V.
6-36-2
Vilella Martinez M.
Balazs A.[9]
6-46-3
Ferreira Silva F.
Moraing M.[8]
6-16-4
Klein L.
Collarini A.
6-46-3
Zapata Miralles B.[11]
Lestienne C.[7]
6-36-767-61
Tseng C.
Heller P.
6-726-36-3
R32
Safwat M.[13]
Bonadio R.
7-627-65
Heller P.
Ignatik U.[16]
6-16-4
Balazs A.[9]
Satral J.
7-57-64
Taberner C.
Vanni L.[12]
6-26-4
Milojevic N.[5]
Choinski J.
6-36-0
Rosol L.[2]
De Schepper K.
3-67-626-3
Giustino L.[3]
Wang T.
6-36-2
Safranek V.
Lamasine T.[14]
7-646-1
Vilella Martinez M.
Nedovyesov A.[6]
6-26-1
Moraing M.[8]
Serdarusic N.
6-36-3
Ferreira Silva F.
Dutra Silva R.[10]
7-617-5
Klein L.
Gimeno Traver D.[15]
6-36-746-2
Collarini A.
Giannessi A.[4]
6-06-2
Lestienne C.[7]
Sakamoto P.
6-47-5
Zapata Miralles B.[11]
Pavlasek A.
2-66-16-4
Tseng C.
Martin A.[1]
6-26-736-2
R64
Pavlasek A.
Grigelis L.
6-26-0
Serdarusic N.
Yevseyev D.
6-16-1
Klein L.
Vrbensky M.
6-33-67-5
Bonadio R.
Maamoun K.
6-707-626-0
Taberner C.
Forejtek J.
6-36-3
Choinski J.
Setkic A.
6-36-736-2
Wang T.
Lehecka J.
4-66-46-3
Safranek V.
Blancaneaux G.
6-36-4
Satral J.
Nejedly P.
3-66-36-2
Vilella Martinez M.
Damm M.
6-16-1
Ferreira Silva F.
Sels J.
6-23-66-2
Collarini A.
Denolly C.
6-16-2
Sakamoto P.
Jomby T.
6-16-2
Heller P.
Kopriva V.
6-26-3
Tseng C.
Muller A.
6-756-47-64
De Schepper K.
Stanek R.
6-22-66-4