Bernabe Zapata Miralles vs Constant Lestienne — Prague CH Round of 16

Prague CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
ESP11
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
1413ELO
1407Clay ELO
29 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 July 2019
clay
FRA7
Constant Lestienne
#1261ATP
34 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLWLL
Zapata Miralles B.
6-3 6-7 7-6
Lestienne C.
Zapata Miralles B.
666772
Lestienne C.
378611

Bernabe Zapata Miralles defeated Constant Lestienne 6-3 6-7 7-6 in the Prague CH round of 16 on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Constant Lestienne came in leading the head-to-head 1–0, defending last year's round of 32. Bernabe Zapata Miralles claimed a first win over Constant Lestienne in two meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 1–1.

Key context

Head to head

0–1
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2024-01-29MontpellierR32hardConstant Lestienne4-6 6-4 6-2

Serve vs return

This season
Zapata Miralles B.serving59% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Lestienne C.

Lestienne C.serving66% hold

wins 56% of points on serve vs Zapata Miralles B.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Zapata Miralles B.Lestienne C.
1st serve in·Slight edge
67%
60%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
63%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
47%
48%
Service points won·Even
57%
61%
Return points won·Even
41%
40%
Break points saved·Even
55%
59%
Aces / match·Clear edge
1.6
4.2
Double faults / match·Clear edge
2.0
3.1

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Zapata Miralles B.Lestienne C.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
49
41
Break points saved·Clear edge
74
86
Break points won·Dominant
80
39
Deciding sets·Dominant
56
26
Tiebreaks·Dominant
3
70

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Vilella Martinez M.
Tseng C.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Tseng C.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-16-4
Vilella Martinez M.
Taberner C.
7-56-2
Quarter-finals
Vilella Martinez M.
Giustino L.[3]
6-07-67
Ferreira Silva F.
Klein L.
3-66-16-0
Tseng C.
Zapata Miralles B.[11]
5-76-46-3
Taberner C.
Rosol L.[2]
6-26-2
R16
Rosol L.[2]
Safwat M.[13]
4-66-36-2
Taberner C.
Milojevic N.[5]
6-46-3
Giustino L.[3]
Safranek V.
6-36-2
Vilella Martinez M.
Balazs A.[9]
6-46-3
Ferreira Silva F.
Moraing M.[8]
6-16-4
Klein L.
Collarini A.
6-46-3
Zapata Miralles B.[11]
Lestienne C.[7]
6-36-767-61
Tseng C.
Heller P.
6-726-36-3
R32
Safwat M.[13]
Bonadio R.
7-627-65
Heller P.
Ignatik U.[16]
6-16-4
Balazs A.[9]
Satral J.
7-57-64
Taberner C.
Vanni L.[12]
6-26-4
Milojevic N.[5]
Choinski J.
6-36-0
Rosol L.[2]
De Schepper K.
3-67-626-3
Giustino L.[3]
Wang T.
6-36-2
Safranek V.
Lamasine T.[14]
7-646-1
Vilella Martinez M.
Nedovyesov A.[6]
6-26-1
Moraing M.[8]
Serdarusic N.
6-36-3
Ferreira Silva F.
Dutra Silva R.[10]
7-617-5
Klein L.
Gimeno Traver D.[15]
6-36-746-2
Collarini A.
Giannessi A.[4]
6-06-2
Lestienne C.[7]
Sakamoto P.
6-47-5
Zapata Miralles B.[11]
Pavlasek A.
2-66-16-4
Tseng C.
Martin A.[1]
6-26-736-2
R64
Pavlasek A.
Grigelis L.
6-26-0
Serdarusic N.
Yevseyev D.
6-16-1
Klein L.
Vrbensky M.
6-33-67-5
Bonadio R.
Maamoun K.
6-707-626-0
Taberner C.
Forejtek J.
6-36-3
Choinski J.
Setkic A.
6-36-736-2
Wang T.
Lehecka J.
4-66-46-3
Safranek V.
Blancaneaux G.
6-36-4
Satral J.
Nejedly P.
3-66-36-2
Vilella Martinez M.
Damm M.
6-16-1
Ferreira Silva F.
Sels J.
6-23-66-2
Collarini A.
Denolly C.
6-16-2
Sakamoto P.
Jomby T.
6-16-2
Heller P.
Kopriva V.
6-26-3
Tseng C.
Muller A.
6-756-47-64
De Schepper K.
Stanek R.
6-22-66-4