Tak Khunn Wang vs Jiri Lehecka — Prague CH Round of 64

Prague CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
FRA
Tak Khunn Wang
34 yrs · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWLWWWLWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 July 2019
clay
Jiri Lehecka
CZE
Jiri Lehecka
#12ATP
1922ELO
1826Clay ELO
$1.5MYTD
$8.9MCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWWLWLWWL
Wang T.
4-6 6-4 6-3
Lehecka J.
Wang T.
4662
Lehecka J.
6431

Tak Khunn Wang defeated Jiri Lehecka 4-6 6-4 6-3 in the Prague CH round of 64 on clay.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Wang T.serving77% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Lehecka J.

Lehecka J.serving82% hold

wins 64% of points on serve vs Wang T.

Serve advantage — Lehecka J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Wang T.Lehecka J.
—
Serve
65
—
Return
21

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Wang T.Lehecka J.
1st serve in·Slight edge
58%
63%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
66%
74%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
66%
Return points won·Even
38%
35%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.8
7.1
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.7
2.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (38 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Wang T.Lehecka J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
39
86
Break points saved·Dominant
59
99
Break points won·Clear edge
44
62
Deciding sets·Dominant
60
98
Tiebreaks·Dominant
33
96

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Wang T.Lehecka J.
Freshness·
—
74

Lehecka J.: 6 days rest · 1 match, 44 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Vilella Martinez M.
Tseng C.
6-46-2
Semi-finals
Tseng C.
Ferreira Silva F.
6-16-4
Vilella Martinez M.
Taberner C.
7-56-2
Quarter-finals
Vilella Martinez M.
Giustino L.[3]
6-07-67
Ferreira Silva F.
Klein L.
3-66-16-0
Tseng C.
Zapata Miralles B.[11]
5-76-46-3
Taberner C.
Rosol L.[2]
6-26-2
R16
Rosol L.[2]
Safwat M.[13]
4-66-36-2
Taberner C.
Milojevic N.[5]
6-46-3
Giustino L.[3]
Safranek V.
6-36-2
Vilella Martinez M.
Balazs A.[9]
6-46-3
Ferreira Silva F.
Moraing M.[8]
6-16-4
Klein L.
Collarini A.
6-46-3
Zapata Miralles B.[11]
Lestienne C.[7]
6-36-767-61
Tseng C.
Heller P.
6-726-36-3
R32
Safwat M.[13]
Bonadio R.
7-627-65
Heller P.
Ignatik U.[16]
6-16-4
Balazs A.[9]
Satral J.
7-57-64
Taberner C.
Vanni L.[12]
6-26-4
Milojevic N.[5]
Choinski J.
6-36-0
Rosol L.[2]
De Schepper K.
3-67-626-3
Giustino L.[3]
Wang T.
6-36-2
Safranek V.
Lamasine T.[14]
7-646-1
Vilella Martinez M.
Nedovyesov A.[6]
6-26-1
Moraing M.[8]
Serdarusic N.
6-36-3
Ferreira Silva F.
Dutra Silva R.[10]
7-617-5
Klein L.
Gimeno Traver D.[15]
6-36-746-2
Collarini A.
Giannessi A.[4]
6-06-2
Lestienne C.[7]
Sakamoto P.
6-47-5
Zapata Miralles B.[11]
Pavlasek A.
2-66-16-4
Tseng C.
Martin A.[1]
6-26-736-2
R64
Pavlasek A.
Grigelis L.
6-26-0
Serdarusic N.
Yevseyev D.
6-16-1
Klein L.
Vrbensky M.
6-33-67-5
Bonadio R.
Maamoun K.
6-707-626-0
Taberner C.
Forejtek J.
6-36-3
Choinski J.
Setkic A.
6-36-736-2
Wang T.
Lehecka J.
4-66-46-3
Safranek V.
Blancaneaux G.
6-36-4
Satral J.
Nejedly P.
3-66-36-2
Vilella Martinez M.
Damm M.
6-16-1
Ferreira Silva F.
Sels J.
6-23-66-2
Collarini A.
Denolly C.
6-16-2
Sakamoto P.
Jomby T.
6-16-2
Heller P.
Kopriva V.
6-26-3
Tseng C.
Muller A.
6-756-47-64
De Schepper K.
Stanek R.
6-22-66-4