Mitchell Krueger vs Jannik Sinner — Binghamton CH Round of 16

Binghamton CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 16
Mitchell Krueger
USA7
Mitchell Krueger
#364ATP
1461ELO
1436Hard ELO
32 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WLLLLLLLLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 July 2019
hard
Jannik Sinner
ITA9
Jannik Sinner
#1ATP
2320ELO
2263Hard ELO
$6.9MYTD
$65MCAREER
24 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
WWWWWWWLWW
Krueger M.
7-5 1-6 6-3
Sinner J.
Krueger M.
7162
Sinner J.
5631

Mitchell Krueger defeated Jannik Sinner 7-5 1-6 6-3 in the Binghamton CH round of 16 on hard. The upset overturned the form book — Jannik Sinner came in ranked #1.

Key context

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Krueger M.serving76% hold

wins 61% of points on serve vs Sinner J.

Sinner J.serving93% hold

wins 72% of points on serve vs Krueger M.

Serve advantage — Sinner J.

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on hard

Krueger M.Sinner J.
—
Serve
100
—
Return
100

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the hard field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Krueger M.Sinner J.
1st serve in·Even
64%
62%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
69%
79%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
51%
58%
Service points won·Slight edge
63%
71%
Return points won·Even
38%
41%
Break points saved·Clear edge
60%
74%
Aces / match·Clear edge
4.5
7.4
Double faults / match·Slight edge
2.0
1.6

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 200). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Krueger M.Sinner J.
Clutch Rating·Dominant
16
100
Break points saved·Clear edge
87
100
Break points won·Dominant
14
100
Deciding sets·Dominant
13
100
Tiebreaks·Dominant
0
100

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Krueger M.Sinner J.
Freshness·Dominant
87
51

Krueger M.: 1 day rest · 1 match, 20 games (7d) · Sinner J.: 2 days rest · 3 matches, 109 games (7d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Medium-fastrewards aggression
SlowFast

Draw

Final
Sugita Y.[11]
Menezes J.[14]
7-621-66-2
Semi-finals
Menezes J.[14]
Karlovskiy E.[15]
6-36-3
Sugita Y.[11]
Krueger M.[7]
6-34-66-4
Quarter-finals
Karlovskiy E.[15]
Cressy M.
7-624-67-64
Menezes J.[14]
Lee D.[10]
7-56-2
Sugita Y.[11]
Purcell M.[13]
6-36-1
Krueger M.[7]
Sela D.[4]
1-67-656-4
R16
Menezes J.[14]
Rybakov A.
7-636-3
Krueger M.[7]
Sinner J.[9]
7-51-66-3
Cressy M.
Bangoura S.
4-66-27-63
Karlovskiy E.[15]
Ritschard A.
6-47-64
Sela D.[4]
Altamirano C.
6-47-5
Sugita Y.[11]
Leshem E.
6-37-64
Purcell M.[13]
Tabilo A.
6-46-4
Lee D.[10]
Gabashvili T.
6-46-3
R32
Cressy M.
Aragone J.[12]
7-674-66-3
Rybakov A.
Stakhovsky S.[3]
7-684-67-65
Purcell M.[13]
Sarmiento R.
7-636-747-61
Gabashvili T.
Rubin N.[5]
6-756-16-4
Krueger M.[7]
Gomez Herrera C.
6-43-67-65
Menezes J.[14]
Saville L.
6-46-3
Sugita Y.[11]
Ortega Olmedo R.
7-56-1
Karlovskiy E.[15]
Mcnally J.
6-46-776-1
Ritschard A.
Ramanathan R.[2]
2-67-636-2
Bangoura S.
Kwiatkowski T.[8]
7-646-4
Lee D.[10]
Vukic A.
6-36-3
Sinner J.[9]
Barrios Vera T.
6-44-66-4
Sela D.[4]
Kirchheimer S.
7-56-2
Leshem E.
Polmans M.[6]
6-46-3
Tabilo A.
Fruttero J.
6-37-5
R64
Ortega Olmedo R.
Kozlov S.
6-753-0
Sarmiento R.
Uzhylovsky V.
6-33-66-2
Tabilo A.
Shane R.
6-36-4
Leshem E.
Hidalgo D.
6-46-2
Saville L.
Redlicki M.
6-757-627-62
Ritschard A.
Pervolarakis M.
3-66-46-4
Mcnally J.
Pasha N.
7-626-4
Cressy M.
Brown P.
6-36-4
Bangoura S.
Fenty A.
6-37-5
Rybakov A.
Saraiva B.
6-776-16-3
Vukic A.
Ponwith N.
6-26-1
Gabashvili T.
Poling K.
6-17-5
Gomez Herrera C.
Smith R.
7-57-63
Barrios Vera T.
Zakharov A.
6-26-2
Altamirano C.
Glasspool L.
6-17-60
Kirchheimer S.
Gonzalez A.
7-656-3