Mikael Ymer vs Tallon Griekspoor — Tampere CH Final

Tampere CH · CHALLENGER · Final
SWE3
Mikael Ymer
27 yrs · 183 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWLWLWWLL
2 — 1
Sets
Monday, 22 July 2019
clay
Tallon Griekspoor
NED9
Tallon Griekspoor
#57ATP
1789ELO
1726Clay ELO
$970kYTD
$8.1MCAREER
30 yrs · 188 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWLLWWLW
Ymer M.
6-3 5-7 6-3
Griekspoor T.
Ymer M.
6562
Griekspoor T.
3731

Mikael Ymer defeated Tallon Griekspoor 6-3 5-7 6-3 in the Tampere CH final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Tallon Griekspoor came in leading the head-to-head 2–0, defending the title. Mikael Ymer claimed a first win over Tallon Griekspoor in three meetings, narrowing the head-to-head to 2–1.

Key context

  • Match story: Mikael Ymer closed it out in three sets, 6–3 5–7 6–3.

Head to head

0–2
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2023-06-12s HertogenboschR32grassTallon Griekspoor6-2 3-6 6-3
2023-02-13RotterdamR32hardTallon Griekspoor7-6(7) 7-5

Serve vs return

This season
Ymer M.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Griekspoor T.

Griekspoor T.serving80% hold

wins 63% of points on serve vs Ymer M.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Serve & return on clay

Ymer M.Griekspoor T.
—
Serve
19
—
Return
26

Per-surface Serve / Return Rating (0–100, percentile within the clay field, opponent-adjusted over 52 weeks). About

Statistics

This season
Ymer M.Griekspoor T.
1st serve in·Even
67%
64%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
65%
75%
2nd serve points won·Even
48%
52%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
67%
Return points won·Slight edge
40%
33%
Break points saved·Slight edge
58%
65%
Aces / match·Dominant
2.5
8.6
Double faults / match·Even
3.2
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 198). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ymer M.Griekspoor T.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
71
76
Break points saved·Slight edge
90
99
Break points won·Dominant
71
34
Deciding sets·Even
94
94
Tiebreaks·Dominant
29
97

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Ymer M.Griekspoor T.
Freshness·
—
96

Griekspoor T.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Slowlow bounce, long rallies
SlowFast
Final
Ymer M.[3]
Griekspoor T.[9]
6-35-76-3
Semi-finals
Griekspoor T.[9]
Sousa P.[1]
7-610-0
Ymer M.[3]
Rola B.[5]
6-747-57-5
Quarter-finals
Sousa P.[1]
Coria F.[7]
6-46-2
Rola B.[5]
Ymer E.[2]
6-17-63
Griekspoor T.[9]
Coppejans K.[4]
6-26-4
Ymer M.[3]
Krstin P.[11]
2-66-17-65
R16
Krstin P.[11]
Clezar G.
7-636-1
Coria F.[7]
Doumbia S.
6-26-3
Ymer M.[3]
Niklas Salminen P.
6-44-66-3
Ymer E.[2]
Ruusuvuori E.[16]
6-24-66-3
Rola B.[5]
Elias G.
6-16-4
Griekspoor T.[9]
Horansky F.[8]
6-41-66-3
Coppejans K.[4]
Vanneste J.
6-766-16-0
Sousa P.[1]
Nedelko I.
6-16-0
R32
Coppejans K.[4]
Hassan B.
6-36-3
Coria F.[7]
Olivo R.
7-56-746-3
Rola B.[5]
Kuzmanov D.
6-22-1
Ymer E.[2]
Vasa E.
6-16-0
Niklas Salminen P.
Viola M.[13]
1-66-46-1
Horansky F.[8]
Guinard M.
6-776-27-64
Clezar G.
Gaio F.[6]
6-37-5
Ruusuvuori E.[16]
Durasovic V.
6-15-76-4
Ymer M.[3]
Van De Zandschulp B.
6-42-66-2
Krstin P.[11]
Oconnell C.
6-41-66-3
Griekspoor T.[9]
Karatsev A.
3-66-46-3
Vanneste J.
Oliveira G.[14]
6-37-65
Doumbia S.
Kolar Z.[12]
6-14-66-4
Nedelko I.
Zopp J.[15]
6-26-726-2
Sousa P.[1]
Zhurbin A.
6-33-66-1
Elias G.
Quiroz R.[10]
6-786-36-3
R64
Elias G.
Cuevas M.
7-56-0
Kuzmanov D.
Pellegrino A.
4-66-37-5
Niklas Salminen P.
Bega A.
4-67-657-64
Oconnell C.
Sultanov K.
7-56-4
Clezar G.
Piros Z.
6-36-4
Doumbia S.
Patael B.
6-30-0
Vanneste J.
Reboul F.
7-626-2
Olivo R.
Gakhov I.
7-56-756-4
Zhurbin A.
Heyman C.
6-46-2
Hassan B.
Virtanen P.
7-636-1
Nedelko I.
Heliovaara H.
6-43-66-1
Vasa E.
Dima D.
6-46-4
Durasovic V.
Rikkonen R.
2-67-56-0
Karatsev A.
Vavassori A.
6-26-2
Guinard M.
Eriksson M.
6-46-1
Van De Zandschulp B.
Zekic M.
6-46-2