Brandon Holt vs Liam Draxl — Granby CH Round of 64

Granby CH · CHALLENGER · Round of 64
USA
Brandon Holt
#657ATP
1537ELO
1507Hard ELO
28 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLWWLLLLWW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 July 2019
hard
Liam Draxl
CAN
Liam Draxl
#223ATP
1592ELO
1565Hard ELO
$201kYTD
$642kCAREER
24 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLWWWLWWW
Holt B.
6-4 6-4
Draxl L.
Holt B.
662
Draxl L.
440

Brandon Holt defeated Liam Draxl 6-4 6-4 in the Granby CH round of 64 on hard.

Key context

  • Match story: Brandon Holt edged a tight contest from start to finish — 6–4 6–4.

Head to head

No previous meetings on record.

Serve vs return

This season
Holt B.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Draxl L.

Draxl L.serving78% hold

wins 62% of points on serve vs Holt B.

Even serve battle

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Holt B.Draxl L.
1st serve in·Even
66%
66%
1st serve points won·Even
69%
69%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
63%
62%
Return points won·Even
39%
40%
Break points saved·Even
61%
60%
Aces / match·Slight edge
4.9
4.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.0
3.2

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (199 vs 194). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Holt B.Draxl L.
Clutch Rating·Slight edge
58
66
Break points saved·Even
85
83
Break points won·Slight edge
31
36
Deciding sets·Clear edge
79
94
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
69
75

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Freshness

Recent load
Holt B.Draxl L.
Freshness·
—
98

Draxl L.: 13 days rest · 1 match (14d). Higher means fresher. About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Escobedo E.
Uchiyama Y.[3]
7-656-4
Semi-finals
Uchiyama Y.[3]
Polansky P.[2]
7-676-4
Escobedo E.
Gojo B.
6-737-636-2
Quarter-finals
Polansky P.[2]
Diez S.[9]
6-37-64
Uchiyama Y.[3]
Li Z.[10]
6-736-46-1
Escobedo E.
Couacaud E.[6]
7-57-5
Gojo B.
Moriya H.[13]
7-626-4
R16
Diez S.[9]
Harris A.[7]
6-46-2
Li Z.[10]
Ilkel C.
4-67-637-5
Escobedo E.
Pospisil V.[4]
4-66-26-3
Gojo B.
Neuchrist M.
6-33-0
Polansky P.[2]
Galarneau A.
7-56-2
Moriya H.[13]
Gombos N.[1]
6-37-65
Couacaud E.[6]
Sakharov G.
6-16-4
Uchiyama Y.[3]
Petrovic D.[16]
6-46-4
R32
Uchiyama Y.[3]
Sanchez M.
6-44-1
Couacaud E.[6]
Zhu E.
6-43-66-3
Li Z.[10]
Garanganga T.
7-637-66
Gombos N.[1]
Mansouri S.
6-47-5
Galarneau A.
Banes M.[15]
6-36-2
Diez S.[9]
Holt B.
6-26-4
Petrovic D.[16]
Sarkissian A.
7-656-4
Ilkel C.
Janvier M.[5]
7-56-3
Sakharov G.
Watanuki Y.[11]
6-47-5
Escobedo E.
Uchida K.[14]
7-56-3
Pospisil V.[4]
Peck J.
6-36-3
Gojo B.
Goransson A.
6-46-3
Neuchrist M.
Santillan A.[12]
6-06-756-4
Polansky P.[2]
Arconada J.
6-14-66-2
Moriya H.[13]
Sigouin B.
6-36-756-3
Harris A.[7]
Mertens Y.
6-16-1
R64
Peck J.
Simon T.
6-46-4
Ilkel C.
Grills J.
6-16-0
Sarkissian A.
Muamba N.
7-56-2
Arconada J.
Klein B.
7-687-5
Galarneau A.
Reese H.
6-27-62
Holt B.
Draxl L.
6-46-4
Sanchez M.
Krainik P.
3-67-666-0
Zhu E.
Nys H.
6-45-76-3
Sakharov G.
Lebedev A.
6-31-66-0
Escobedo E.
Verbeek S.
6-33-66-2
Gojo B.
Boulais J.
6-26-2
Neuchrist M.
Novikov D.
6-47-64
Sigouin B.
Baadi T.
6-706-46-2
Mansouri S.
Hoyt E.
6-43-67-65
Garanganga T.
Okamura I.
6-46-4
Mertens Y.
Ghasemi K.
6-26-0