Albert Ramos vs Pablo Andujar — Gstaad Semi-final

Gstaad · ATP · Semi-final
ESP
Albert Ramos
1558ELO
1526Clay ELO
38 yrs · 188 cm · Left-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LWWLLLLLLL
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 22 July 2019
clay
ESP7
Pablo Andujar
40 yrs · 180 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLLLLW
Ramos A.
7-6 6-4
Andujar P.
Ramos A.
7762
Andujar P.
6340

Albert Ramos defeated Pablo Andujar 7-6 6-4 in the Gstaad semi-final on clay. The upset overturned the form book — Pablo Andujar came in leading the head-to-head 7–2, but Albert Ramos had been the form player, winning 2 of their last 7 on clay. Albert Ramos narrowed the head-to-head to 7–3.

Key context

Head to head

2–7
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2022-02-14Rio de JaneiroR16clayPablo Andujar7-5 5-7 6-3
2020-02-03CordobaR16clayAlbert Ramos6-3 6-7(4) 6-4
2015-05-24Roland GarrosR128clayPablo Andujar6-2 6-4 7-6(3)
2015-04-20BarcelonaR64clayPablo Andujar6-4 6-1
2014-01-13Australian OpenR128hardPablo Andujar6-4 6-2 6-4
2012-07-16HamburgR32clayAlbert Ramos6-1 6-4
2012-04-09CasablancaFclayPablo Andujar6-1 7-6(5)
2012-03-08Indian Wells MastersR32hardPablo Andujar7-6(5) 6-4
2011-07-31KitzbuhelR16clayPablo Andujar6-2 6-1

Serve vs return

This season
Ramos A.serving63% hold

wins 55% of points on serve vs Andujar P.

Andujar P.serving68% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Ramos A.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Ramos A.Andujar P.
1st serve in·Even
65%
64%
1st serve points won·Even
66%
65%
2nd serve points won·Even
51%
48%
Service points won·Even
60%
59%
Return points won·Even
38%
41%
Break points saved·Even
61%
57%
Aces / match·Slight edge
2.1
1.4
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.9
3.9

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (200 vs 175). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Ramos A.Andujar P.
Clutch Rating·Clear edge
59
38
Break points saved·Slight edge
95
86
Break points won·Slight edge
49
40
Deciding sets·Dominant
80
41
Tiebreaks·Even
22
23

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Weather
25°CPartly cloudy
Wind 10 km/hHumidity 48%
Final
Ramos A.
Stebe C.
6-36-2
Semi-finals
Stebe C.
Sousa J.[5]
3-66-16-2
Ramos A.
Andujar P.[7]
7-636-4
Quarter-finals
Sousa J.[5]
Bautista Agut R.[1]
4-66-37-5
Stebe C.
Fabbiano T.
6-42-66-4
Ramos A.
Carballes Baena R.[6]
6-26-1
Andujar P.[7]
Lajovic D.[3]
7-646-4
R16
Bautista Agut R.[1]
Munar J.[8]
7-676-4
Fabbiano T.
Sonego L.[4]
7-623-66-1
Stebe C.
Vesely J.
7-634-66-3
Andujar P.[7]
Daniel T.
6-13-67-62
Lajovic D.[3]
Istomin D.
6-46-727-62
Carballes Baena R.[6]
Travaglia S.
6-26-4
Ramos A.
Verdasco F.[2]
6-47-64
Sousa J.[5]
Moroni G.
6-46-4
R32
Munar J.[8]
Jaziri M.
5-76-36-4
Vesely J.
Gulbis E.
7-57-5
Stebe C.
Moutet C.[8]
6-46-4
Daniel T.
Baldi F.
6-46-4
Istomin D.
Huesler M.
6-37-60
Travaglia S.
Galan D.
7-676-3
Ramos A.
Laaksonen H.
6-06-3
Andujar P.[7]
Novak D.
6-13-66-3
Fabbiano T.
Ehrat S.
6-47-5
Sousa J.[5]
Darcis S.
6-46-4
Moroni G.
Robredo T.
6-26-2
Carballes Baena R.[6]
Lorenzi P.
6-716-36-2