Igor Sijsling vs Daniel Gimeno Traver — Amersfoort CH Quarter-final

Amersfoort CH · CHALLENGER · Quarter-final
NED
Igor Sijsling
38 yrs · 191 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLWWWLLW
2 — 0
Sets
Monday, 15 July 2019
clay
ESP10
Daniel Gimeno Traver
40 yrs · 185 cm · Right-handed
Last 10 · pre-match
LLLLLLWLLL
Sijsling I.
6-3 7-5
Gimeno Traver D.
Sijsling I.
672
Gimeno Traver D.
350

Igor Sijsling defeated Daniel Gimeno Traver 6-3 7-5 in the Amersfoort CH quarter-final on clay. The result followed the form book — Igor Sijsling came in leading the head-to-head 1–0. Igor Sijsling extended the head-to-head to 2–0.

Key context

  • Match story: Igor Sijsling closed it out in two sets, 6–3 7–5.

Head to head

1–0
DateTournamentRoundSurfaceWinnerScore
2012-08-27US OpenR128hardIgor Sijsling7-5 6-3 6-4

Serve vs return

This season
Sijsling I.serving66% hold

wins 57% of points on serve vs Gimeno Traver D.

Gimeno Traver D.serving57% hold

wins 53% of points on serve vs Sijsling I.

Baseline battle — serve is shaky, expect plenty of breaks

Each player's serve crossed against the other's return, converted to expected hold of serve. Recent completed matches, ATP, WTA & Challenger. About

Statistics

This season
Sijsling I.Gimeno Traver D.
1st serve in·Even
60%
56%
1st serve points won·Slight edge
68%
63%
2nd serve points won·Slight edge
49%
42%
Service points won·Slight edge
60%
54%
Return points won·Even
38%
40%
Break points saved·Even
57%
53%
Aces / match·Slight edge
3.0
2.0
Double faults / match·Dominant
1.6
6.4

Averages over each player's completed matches in the selected window (39 vs 46). ATP, WTA & Challenger.

Clutch

Under pressure
Sijsling I.Gimeno Traver D.
Clutch Rating·Even
11
15
Break points saved·Slight edge
60
50
Break points won·Clear edge
16
30
Deciding sets·Slight edge
13
24
Tiebreaks·Slight edge
27
20

Performance in the biggest moments — break points, deciding sets and tiebreaks (0–100, higher is better). About

Conditions

Court speed
Mediumbalanced pace
SlowFast
Final
Moraing M.[5]
Coppejans K.[2]
6-23-66-3
Semi-finals
Moraing M.[5]
Sijsling I.
6-46-3
Coppejans K.[2]
Rola B.[3]
6-46-0
Quarter-finals
Coppejans K.[2]
Masur D.[11]
2-66-46-4
Rola B.[3]
Kolar Z.[9]
7-56-4
Sijsling I.
Gimeno Traver D.[10]
6-37-5
Moraing M.[5]
Martinez P.[1]
6-46-2
R16
Coppejans K.[2]
Choinski J.
7-656-4
Masur D.[11]
Benchetrit E.[6]
6-26-2
Rola B.[3]
Ignatik U.[13]
6-44-66-0
Kolar Z.[9]
Gakhov I.
6-17-65
Gimeno Traver D.[10]
Safwat M.[7]
6-17-62
Sijsling I.
Fanselow S.
7-56-3
Moraing M.[5]
Sels J.
7-666-2
Martinez P.[1]
Clezar G.
7-656-2
R32
Coppejans K.[2]
Kuzmanov D.
6-31-66-1
Moraing M.[5]
Metreveli A.
6-36-1
Gakhov I.
Kuhn N.[8]
7-54-66-3
Rola B.[3]
Pavlasek A.
4-66-36-1
Ignatik U.[13]
Van Rijthoven T.
6-46-4
Martinez P.[1]
Maamoun K.
7-621-66-2
Masur D.[11]
Rune H.
3-66-46-1
Clezar G.
Kamke T.[15]
6-26-2
Choinski J.
De Bakker T.[14]
6-25-76-2
Safwat M.[7]
Heyman C.
6-26-1
Gimeno Traver D.[10]
Ruusuvuori E.
6-27-64
Sijsling I.
Tatlot J.[16]
6-37-5
Fanselow S.
Griekspoor T.[4]
1-66-46-3
Benchetrit E.[6]
De Schepper K.
7-6116-3
Kolar Z.[9]
De Jong J.
7-636-3
Sels J.
Bellucci T.[12]
6-16-4
R64
Van Rijthoven T.
Escobar G.
4-67-617-67
Ruusuvuori E.
Verbeek S.
6-36-4
Maamoun K.
Denolly C.
7-663-66-1
Sijsling I.
Lenz J.
6-46-1
Choinski J.
Ojeda Lara R.
6-26-3
Rune H.
Brouwer G.
6-46-2
Pavlasek A.
Wang T.
6-36-2
De Jong J.
Griekspoor S.
4-66-47-67
Gakhov I.
Robert S.
5-77-56-2
Heyman C.
Avidzba A.
6-36-2
Metreveli A.
Lootsma N.
6-34-66-4
Sels J.
Van De Zandschulp B.
7-662-66-3
Kuzmanov D.
Blancaneaux G.
7-56-1
De Schepper K.
Deckers A.
6-36-4
Fanselow S.
Nijboer R.
6-46-2
Clezar G.
Ferreira Silva F.
7-56-1